The purpose of this brief essay is to offer a different basis for freedom than that given in post-Enlightenment, free societies of the West. The argument presented is that freedom understood as a universal human right ends up with various conflicting views and fails in a variety of ways. Christians often seek to establish freedom for their faith on the grounds of universal rights, but the position taken here is that they need to articulate their view of freedom from within their own religious tradition. The Present State of the Argument The defense of freedom in free societies seems to require defending not only good things but also bad things. We defend free speech, but to do so we end up defending the free speech rights of hateful groups or the purveyors of pornography. Freedom of religion is defended in such a way as to defend all belief systems: to defend one, one must defend the right of all. This only makes sense to those who do not enquire too deeply into the belie