Skip to main content

How to Destroy a Seminary: 4. Offer Student Government Loans

 Government loans create two problems for the seminary.  This matter applies to American seminaries.  The government student loan programme is supposed to make education possible for students without the funds for study.  Its effect on education has been to increase the costs of an education well above the rate of inflation.  Seminaries have done what they can to keep education affordable, but with government loans as an option, they have allowed their costs to grow in comparable ways to other educational institutions.  That is, they have not solved their problem of the costs of an education as a Christian community should but as an academic institution does.  One result is that the graduates enter ministry with huge debts and, in America, they will already have accumulated educational debts from their undergraduate studies.

A second problem with seminaries that offer student loans for their education is that they open themselves up to government regulations.  If an institution accepts government money in the form of student loan programmes or funding for veterans’ education, the government may argue that its various regulations must be followed.  These regulations may, for example, apply to who can or must be hired.  In this way, the government oversteps any separation of Church and State and manages to make laws that regulate religion.  Even the threat of this happening can influence what a seminary stipulates for its community life.

The solution would be to ask denominations to step up to the game and provide the funding to train its ministers.  Some are much better at this than others, to be sure.  Yet the academic model for theological education allows other denominations to skirt this responsibility, leaves students to pay for their preparation for ministry, and sets faculty up for an academic career more than an ecclesiastical ministry.  This loose relationship between some denominations and seminary training also encourages the growth of independent churches.  A further consequence is that this weakens the denominations and leaves students and graduates with little serious ecclesiastical affiliation.  It distorts how the seminary itself might develop in many good ways as a Christian ministry, and so basing the seminary’s finances on student tuition funded by government loans is a good way to destroy a seminary over time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more

'Nature' and ‘Against Nature’ in Romans 1:26-27: A Study in the Primary Sources

Introduction In Romans 1:26-27, Paul distinguishes ‘unnatural’ from ‘natural’, saying that homosexual acts among both women and men are ‘unnatural’.  Romans 1:26-27 For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions. Their women exchanged natural intercourse [ physikēn chrēsin, natural use ] for unnatural [ para physin, against nature ],  27 and in the same way also the men, giving up natural intercourse [ physikēn chrēsin, natural use ] with women, were consumed with passion for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the due penalty for their error. This understanding, however, has been questioned, and the debate centres around what Paul means by ‘natural’ ( physikon and kata physin ) and ‘unnatural’ ( para physin ).  Those questioning this understanding in recent years (it was not questioned in the history of the church until now) [1] focus on the notion of ‘natural’ rather than the Greek phrases, but bo...
Post a Comment
Read more