In arguing for the resurrection, Paul puts forward a strange argument in the paragraph in 1 Corinthians 15.29-34: Otherwise, what do people mean by being baptized on behalf of the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized on their behalf? What is baptism on behalf of the dead? Commentaries offer a variety of interpretations for this obscure reference, and this interpretation that I have garnered from my own reading is one I believe is along the right track. First, the word ‘baptism’ is broader than Christian baptism itself and means to dip in or under a liquid such as water or wine. We should not read our Christian view of 'baptism' into the meaning of this verse. Note, second, that Paul does not say, ‘You’ do this or that Christians should do this. He says that people do this. These 'people' are those in the Graeco-Roman culture. Third, note that in this whole paragraph his main point is that there is life after this...
I wonder if Fyodor Dostoevsky’s tale about Jesus’ return might have been inspired by an actual story of Jesus in the synagogue of Capernaum. In The Brothers Karamazov , the character Ivan Karamazov tells the tale of a Grand Inquisitor who puts Jesus on trial upon His return to earth. The Inquisitor claims that the Church has improved upon Jesus’ work and no longer needs Him. This Church, whatever it is, does not need Jesus, does not want Him. The shocking story Ivan tells is shocking mostly for how true it is in so many contexts, denominations, and local churches. In Mark’s Gospel, Jesus attends the synagogue of His adopted home in Capernaum and immediately encounters a man possessed by an unclean spirit. The man—or the unclean spirit in him—cries out, ‘What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God’ (Mark 1.23-24). Beyond the connection in these stories of a ...