Skip to main content

Issues Facing Missions Today 34: ‘Radicalized’

Issues Facing Missions Today 34: ‘Radicalized’

A peculiar word, ‘radical’.  The English word really relates to the word ‘root’ (Latin, radix)—getting to the heart or root of what something truly is.  But we hear the word used differently: someone who is ‘radical’ is ‘out there,’ ‘on the edge,’ even ‘dangerous’.

The word is now being used in the media’s phrase, ‘radical Islam.’  If someone commits murder as a Muslim the Western press will say that this isn’t real Islam but a radical form of Islam.  The person is said to have been ‘radicalized.’  The question is, ‘Is real Islam the opposite of radical Islam, or is radical Islam real Islam?’  Are these radicals getting to the root of their faith, or are they departing from it?  As far as politicians and the press are concerned, it would be terribly inconvenient in a politically correct world to identify radical Islam with real Islam. 

So much for confusing the word ‘radical’ with the opposite of its original meaning.

The question I would like to ask is, ‘What if you became radicalized?’  What if your thoughts, words, and actions were guided by your most basic convictions rather than some compromise of them?  Is the problem departing from root convictions or following the wrong root convictions?  Almost daily in the news we have to reckon with people who are led to perform shockingly evil things as they follow a radical path set by their most basic convictions. 

Jesus called his disciples to radical discipleship.  He criticized the religious groups of his day for failing to be radical enough.  If you are going to live by your most basic convictions about God and His kingdom, you will be ‘out there’ in your thoughts, words, and actions as far as society is concerned.  Jesus said to his disciples,

Matthew 5:20  For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

He also challenged the Jewish priestly class, the Sadducees, for not getting to the ‘root’ of faith in God.  They failed in their understanding of Scripture, God’s Word, and they failed in their understanding of the power of God.  For them, religion was disconnected from its authority and faith in God.  It was a collection of ideas that need not bother someone too deeply, except in the exercise of religious duties.  Their religious activities did not touch their convictions about finances, politics, or trust in God.  They only required ritual acts that gave them a cultural identity and secured their positions of power and respect in society.  So Jesus indicted the Sadducees with words that could be spoken to many a church today, saying, ‘you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God’ (Matthew 22:29).

In the West, politicians, the press, and the public square do not appreciate radicals, whether those living according to their root convictions or persons ‘out there,’ taking their convictions in the ‘wrong’ direction.  Far better, it is thought, to hold everything loosely.

But what if Christians were radicalized?  Because Jesus Christ crucified is at the root of Christian convictions about God, radicalized Christians would not and do not strap explosives to their bodies and blow up a crowd of innocent people.  They do not join an army to attack their enemies.  They do not put people to death for blasphemy but tell people that Jesus died for their sins.  They do not riot in the streets, destroy property, and steal every time some real or imagined racial injustice occurs.  Instead, like relatives and members of the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, they forgive the hate-filled murderer (17 June, 2015).

The radical Christian picks up his or her figurative cross to follow Jesus, who himself went to die on a real cross (Luke 14.27).  The radical Christian does not attack enemies but prays for them (Matthew 5.44-45).  The radical Christian ‘seeks first the kingdom of God and his righteousness’ (Matthew 6.33).  The radical Christian does not seek unity and tolerance as cardinal virtues because his or her commitment to God and his Kingdom could even divide families (Luke 12.51-53).  The radical Christian forsakes home comforts and reasonable responsibilities that might postpone the call to follow Jesus in God’s mission throughout the world (Luke 9.58, 60, 62).

What might happen if you were radicalized—if you dug deeply enough into your root convictions and lived accordingly?  Would you pursue hate-filled convictions that destroy any opposition in your way?  Or would you discover that you do not even have any convictions of consequence so that you can live a self-gratifying life?

More to the point, what if you became a radicalized Christian?  You would first discover that the radical Christian life is the only, real Christian life.  The disciple of Christ indulges himself or herself in no private religious imaginations that make little difference in life. 


As a Christian—a radical Christian, a real Christian—what mediocrity in life must you forsake?  What self-sacrificing, suffering cross would you raise to your shoulders to follow Jesus?  What earthly pursuits would be set aside for God’s rule and mission?  What passions of the flesh would you crucify in order to receive the resurrection life of Jesus?  What passing pleasures would you relinquish as you ‘press on to the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus’ (Philippians 3.14)?  What if you became radicalized?  Your root convictions, your faith in Jesus Christ, would transform your thinking, speaking, and actions.  And you would, as a consequence, be ‘out there’—radical—but in a far different way from those who do not find Jesus at the root of their very being.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more