Skip to main content

Toward a Biblical Theology of Government and the Nations

The early Christians were not in a position to change government.  Yet they had a theology of institutions that was derived largely from their Old Testament Scriptures.  In broad outline, their theology of nations and governments involved the following convictions and narrative of God's unfolding plan:
  1. God is in ultimate control of world history (cf. Daniel, Revelation; Psalm 33.10; Isaiah 40.15-17);
  2. God has made the nations (Psalm 86.9) and rules over them (Psalm 2; 47; 66.7; 67.4; 72.11; 94.10; 113.4); He is King (Psalm 10.16);
  3. God permits political authorities to rise and fall (Daniel 2), and He disciplines the sinful nations (Psalm 94.10; Ezekiel 28.1-10; 29.12-16; Habakkuk 3.11);
  4. God intended Israel to be an exemplary nation, positively and negatively (Genesis 12.3; Jeremiah 4.1-2; Ezekiel 5.5-17; 6.8-14; 22.15-16; 28.25; 37.28) from which other nations might learn righteousness (Isaiah 2.2-4; Micah 4.2); in the return from exile, the nations would learn of God’s power to save sinful Israel, and He would thereby keep His name from being profaned among the nations (Psalm 106.41, 47; Ezekiel 20.9, 14, 22; 20.41; 36.20-38); God also intended the king of Israel to be an exemplary king (Psalm 72), and the Messiah will rule over the nations (Revelation 12.5; 19.15); the nations are God’s audience for the revelation of His righteousness, holiness, and glory (Psalm 98.2-3; 126.2; Isaiah 52.10; 62.2; Ezekiel 38.23; 39.7, 28);
  5. God uses government authority to accomplish his purposes, including meting out justice (Psalm 106.40-41; Jeremiah 50.8-12; 51.20-44);
  6. In the end, God will withdraw His hand, and lawlessness will prevail before Jesus returns as Son of Man (Daniel 7.13) to establish justice on the earth (2 Thessalonians 2.1-12);
  7. Christians, as God's minority people in the world, should pray for all people, including those in authority, so that conditions might be favourable enough for them to live quiet and godly lives in this world and because God wants all people to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth (1 Timothy 2.1-7);
  8. Human institutions, such as government (cf. 1 Samuel 8.4-22), economics (cf. Revelation 18), social distinctions (cf. Galatians 3.25-29; 1 Corinthians 12.13; Colossians 3.11), are temporal, changeable, and of relative worth; they will be changed when God brings about His kingdom rule (Psalm 82.8), which includes bringing justice to the nations (Isaiah 42.1);
  9. Christians are to avoid vengeance, letting God work justice through the law of government (Rom. 12.17-13.8); rather, their focus is a mission to the nations of proclaiming the gospel of the Kingdom to them (Matthew 24.14; 28.18-20); they should even show love to and pray for their enemies (Matthew 5.44);
  10. Ultimately, God will punish the nations (Psalm 59.5, 8; Psalm 110.5-6; Isaiah 34.1-15; Matthew 25.31-46; Isaiah 30.27-28; Jeremiah 30.11; Joel 3.1-21; Zephaniah 3.8; Haggai 2.22; Zechariah 14.1-3); they will acknowledge Him as Lord (Psalm 45; 82.8; 86.9), fear Him (Psalm 102.15), and worship Him (Psalm 22.27-28; 46.10; 86.9; Isaiah 45.22-23; Zephaniah 2.11; Malachi 1.11; Philippians 2.10; Revelation 15.3-4);
  11. God’s plan is to include the nations in His redemption of sinful Israel (Isaiah 42.6; 49.6, 22; 60.3; 66.18-20; Jeremiah 16.19-21; Zechariah 2.11; 8.22-23; Mark 11.17; Romans 1.5; 16.26; 1 Timothy 3.16; Revelation 22.2).
Christians have not always followed this Biblical understanding of government and the nations.  We have not always realized that the Church is not a nation with a land to defend and governmental authority, as Israel, but a community with a mission to proclaim the life-transforming message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the world.  Thus, we have, all too often, acted as though our purpose has required us to use force instead of to be witnesses--even through martyrdom--of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  (In this proclamation and witness lies the West's conviction of freedom of speech versus coercion.)  We have at times--as the history of the West attests--thought of ourselves as a majority with power in and over society rather than a minority called to live by the example of the crucified Jesus Christ, even if this means persecution.  We have not always stood against the powerful currents of culture, even redefining ourselves as priests of the culture by establishing state Churches in Europe and Great Britain that have all ultimately succumbed to the culture.  (As Israel repeatedly did in setting up altars to idols until God punished them by exiling them among the nations, we have recently even seen the post-Christian, mainline denominations in the West prepare liturgies to affirm a culture turned against God's commandments.)  We have not always made God's redemptive mission in the world our mission, all too often trying to establish ourselves in comfortable circumstances with state sanctioned authority and approval.  We have often lived as though Jesus were not coming again, whether taking justice into our own hands or imagining our justice is God's justice.  We, the Church, have too often failed to take up the mantle of the Old Testament prophets, who spoke to the government rulers and their own cultures with God's Words of warning and forgiveness.  We have forgotten that God is still in control, no matter how wasted human institutions become.  We have sought to pray prayers to make God comply to our politics instead of praying that we might have the peace we need from the rulers of this age to live Godly lives under Christ's Lordship in this sinful world.  We have written off our enemies instead of praying for them with the same heart God has to save the world.  Some of us have rejected Israel as though God no longer cares for His covenant people, while others of us have placed Israel as a nation on a pedestal of honour instead of calling it to return to God's rule and salvation in Christ Jesus.  We have at times lost hope in the unfolding story of the world instead of maintaining our faith in God, who is Lord of the nations.  We have too often prayed for our own comforts in our own exile in this world rather than for Christ's return to establish God's justice in the world ('Maranatha'), and some of us have even foolishly believed that God wants Christians to be fully satisfied in this world's life (the Prosperity 'Gospel') as though there is no age to come, no mission to accomplish through suffering and persecution, and no imitation of Christ for disciples.

Thankfully, this does not describe all of us!  Yet now, in our post-Christian era in the West, we need a careful reflection on what constitutes a Biblical understanding of government even as we need a proper understanding of what the Church is and should be.  Moreover, in lands where the Church is growing, such as in many parts of Africa, an understanding of the Church in its relation to the State needs a Biblical foundation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more