Skip to main content

'Let your alms sweat in your hands, until you know to whom you should give'

The early 2nd-century Christian document, the Didache, includes advice about charity.  The last word offered on the teaching is, 'Let your alms sweat in your hands, until you know to whom you should give' (ch. 1).  In this blog post, I would like to redirect readers to an article by David Virtue on Global Christian News. See http://www.globalchristiannews.org/article/christmas-charity-weighing-up-who-you-will-give-to/. In 'Christmas Charity: Weighing Up Who You Will Give To' (30 October, 2017), Virtue points readers to two information services to do exactly what the Didache recommends: 
  •       In England, see http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/ 
  •       In the USA, see https://www.charitynavigator.org/  
Virtue gives information on the following major aid agencies: Food for the Poor, Food for the Hungry, World Vision International, Samaritan's Purse, Tear Fund, Open Doors, Barnabas Fund, and Aid to the Churches in Need.  Of these, only the last two organizations get a 'thumbs up.'  Other charities, no doubt, do much good.  The issue, though, is how much of the money raised actually reaches those for whom it is raised and/or how much top administrators are paid.

In 1994, Graham Hancock wrote a fascinating book, Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business (Atlantic Monthly Press).  Hancock begins by saying that he will not present any information on Christian aid agencies.  As a reporter, he exposed the incompetencies and corruption of the aid business.  More recently, Dambisa Moyo has written Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010).

'Missions' has come to mean almost anything done 'over there' by Christians.  It is a most regrettable broadening of the term when 'almsgiving' or 'charity' or 'aid work' would be the better terminology in many cases.  'Missions' should be reserved for those ministries that have to do with taking the Gospel to the nations--evangelistic, church planting, Bible translation, and teaching ministries.  Yet, as the Didache rightly says, charity is Christian work.  However, we will do well not to act in the manner of non-Christian, peer, aid agencies by becoming 'Lords of Poverty'.  Let us not be guilty in the manner of persons already in Paul's day who imagined 'that godliness is a means of gain' (1 Timothy 6.5).

How much money does the director of your favourite charity earn?  How much of the money raised by the charity actually goes to the people for whom the money is raised?  Is the money actually going to the cause that the charity says it is for?  And do not confuse giving to charities with giving to missions--to the sending (from the Latin, mittere, to send) of persons who bear the Gospel throughout the world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more

James Talarico’s Confused Claims about Christian Convictions, and Europe’s Trans-Society

  Texas Democrat candidate for the senate, James Talarico, has ventured into theological territory meant to challenge orthodox views about God and human sexuality. [1]   Trying to challenge the Christian understanding of gender and sexuality, he alleged that God is ‘nonbinary’.   Clarifying his comment, he averred that God is ‘beyond gender’.   These are contradictory claims. To suggest that God is nonbinary is to locate Him in the created order.  When people claim to be ‘nonbinary’, they are making a claim about their sexuality.  Sex, as we should know but also can see from Genesis 1.26ff, has to do with procreation and multiplying the species on the earth.  Those claiming to be nonbinary are claiming sexuality, whatever ‘nonbinary’ sexual identity means to them. Talarico’s second statement is correct: God is beyond gender.  This is because He is beyond the created order.  God is not both male and female.  He has no sexual identity....
Post a Comment
Read more