Skip to main content

Calling Evil ‘Good’: How Killing Innocent Children is Justified

Various cultures find ways to make killing the innocent morally right, even a moral duty.  The conclusion is what is important; the reasoning is irrelevant--only some path chosen to get there.  Abortion is not merely permitted; it is made into a moral good.  It is justified by the culture, the myths, the politics, and the ethics of a people.  As Isaiah says,

Isaiah 5.20: ‘Woe to those who call evil good

                        and good evil,

             who put darkness for light

                        and light for darkness,

             who put bitter for sweet

                        and sweet for bitter!’ (ESV)

Here are examples of cultures and nations that have called evil concerning children ‘good’.  Their views are captured as statements (not quotations):

Canaan: ‘Our god, Molech, calls for child sacrifices.  Whatever your reason, pass your child through the fire to Molech.  You have a religious reason and right to kill your children.’

Rome: ‘The father has the power of life and death over his slaves and his children.  If he says to kill his newborn child, no law stands in his way.  Leave the child in the hills to die.’

Some Amazonian Tribes: ‘Children born with defects, twins, or triplets are soulless or cursed.  It is right to bury them alive, poison them, or leave them to die.  Kill such children.’

Bassa Komo Tribe, Nigeria: ‘Some children, especially twins, are not human but evil spirits.  They will kill a parent (or both) and are a danger to the community.  They must be killed.

Bolshevik Russia: Laws against abortion are the hypocrisy of the ruling classes.  There is no ethic apart from what the Party dictates.  Lenin allowed abortion; Stalin forbade it, then allowed it.  Do what the Party permits.’

Nazi Germany: ‘Eugenics teaches us that some races are better than others.  No abortion for the master, Aryan race—unless the child is deformed.  Non-Aryan races are encouraged to practice contraception or abortion.’

Communist China: ‘The community is more important than the individual.  One family, one child.  Kill the rest.’

Iceland: ‘Having children with Downs Syndrome is wrong.  We proudly announce we are a nation without such children.  Kill them before they are born.’

America: ‘Freedom is the primary virtue.  Women must have the right to choose.  It is good and right to kill unborn boys and girls if you so choose.’

We Christians, however, live by God’s Word.  We firstly understand that we are highly valued for what we are, not simply for what we can do (viability, ability to choose, social value).  We are created in His own image and likeness (Genesis 1.26-27; 5.1).  Thus, shedding the blood of any person is the murder of one who is made in God's image (Genesis 9.6).  God commands, ‘You shall not murder’ (Exodus 20.13).  He has taught us to praise Him for His creative work in forming us in the womb, just as in His forming humanity from the earth, saying, 

For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.  I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.  Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well.  My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth.  Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there were none of them (Psalm 139.13-16).

We understand that God knows us, as He did the prophet Jeremiah, 'before I formed you in the womb' (Jeremiah 1.5).  God has plans for us before we are born, as Jeremiah says in this verse and Paul says in about his own life in Galatians 1.15.  We understand from Elizabeth's and Mary's meeting that the unborn child can respond to the presence of God (Luke 1.41).  Ever since the 2nd century, Christian authors have recorded the Church's opposition to abortion.

We do not live by the arguments of our cultures.  It is that simple.  We will not take the life of the innocent.  We will not kill the unborn.  Life is a gift from God.  We will not call evil ‘good’.

Nor do we give our support to any who do such a thing or to those who approve of those who do (Romans 1.32).  Our support of innocent life created by God defines us.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more