Paul’s New Covenant Reading of Deuteronomy 30.12-14 in Romans 10.6-9, and the Meaning of ‘All Israel will be saved’ in Romans 11.26

 How does Paul come by his Christological interpretation of Deuteronomy 30.12-14 in Romans 10?  He says,

Rom. 10:6 But the righteousness based on faith says, “Do not say in your heart,[1] ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’” (that is, to bring Christ down) 7 “or ‘Who will descend into the abyss[2]?’” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). 8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith that we proclaim); 9 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

At first glance, such a reading seems strained, since it is a conclusion to the renewal of the Mosaic covenant at the end of Moses’ life, as Israel is preparing to enter the land of promise.  Paul, of course, would have known this just as we do.  So, how is it that he interprets the passage with reference to the New Covenant, which all Christians understood to be established by Jesus through His death on the cross?  Various scholars rightly point out that Paul is finding the Gospel—incarnation, death, and resurrection[3]—in this passage, but it is particularly a New Covenant reading of the passage that makes Paul’s reading understandable.  Douglas Moo rejects this reading,[4] whereas Frank Thielman, for example, argued for it in his Duke University dissertation.[5]  A New Covenant understanding is key to the following interpretation as well, and, it will be argued, Paul finds a New Covenant reading essential to understanding Deuteronomy 30—it is far from a fanciful reading.  The unique argument presented here is that Paul’s reading of Deuteronomy 30 is not only suggested by Deuteronomy’s own theology but also is a reading that he comes to through Isaiah 59.[6]  The argument offered here is that Isaiah 59.20-21 explains Paul’s reading of Deuteronomy 30.12-14 in Romans 10.6-9.  In the process of making this argument, Paul’s meaning of ‘all Israel will be saved’ in Romans 11.26 is also clarified.

Paul’s Two Quotations from Isaiah 59 in Romans

In Romans, Paul twice quotes from Isaiah 59 to explain parts of his theological argument.  Paul’s first theological argument is presented in Romans 1.18-3.20.  In it, Paul argues that both categories of humanity, Gentiles and Jews, are under sin.  In his conclusion to this first argument, he quotes Isaiah 59.7-8 (Romans 3.15-17).  This conclusion comes in the form of a chain of Old Testament quotations to establish that all, both Jews and Gentiles, are under sin (vv. 9-18, 23).  Then, at the end of Paul’s theological exposition in Romans, he turns to a discussion of the mercy of God for both Jews and Gentiles (Romans 9-11).  His final sub-topic in this argument has to do with God’s plan for His covenant people, who are ‘cut off from Christ’ (the language is from Romans 9.3, at the beginning of this larger section).  Paul’s final words on the question of the Jews in God’s plan come in Romans 11.25-32, quoted in the box, below.

Several interpretations have been offered as to what Paul’ means by ‘all Israel will be saved,’ including the idea that ‘Israel’ is used of the Church and not the Jews as God’s covenant people (e.g., John Calvin).  What Paul means by this statement, though, can be seen through the Old Testament quotations that follow.  Romans 11.26-27 are a composite quotation from two Old Testament texts.  They are linked in subject matter and by the word ‘Jacob’.  One of the Jewish rules for interpretation, Gezera Shewa, stated that texts could be linked in interpretation if they shared a word in common.  Thus, Paul brings together Isaiah 59.20-21a and Isaiah 27.9, which are noted in bold in the following quotes.  However, more than the quoted material is presented here.  This is so that the reader can see that Paul has in view more than the keyword link and more than the words from each passage that he quotes.

Romans 11.25-27

Isaiah 27.6-13

Isaiah 59.20-60.21

Rom. 11:25 Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”; 27 “and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins.”

Is. 27.6 In days to come Jacob shall take root, Israel shall blossom and put forth shoots and fill the whole world with fruit. 7 Has he struck them as he struck those who struck them?... Is. 27:9 Therefore by this the guilt of Jacob will be atoned for, and this will be the full fruit of the removal of his sin:… 11 When its boughs are dry, they are broken…. 12 In that day from the river Euphrates to the Brook of Egypt the LORD will thresh out the grain, and you will be gleaned one by one, O people of Israel. 13 And in that day a great trumpet will be blown, and those who were lost in the land of Assyria and those who were driven out to the land of Egypt will come and worship the LORD on the holy mountain at Jerusalem.

Is. 59:20 “And a Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who turn from transgression,” declares the LORD. 21 “And as for me, this is my covenant with them,” says the LORD: “My Spirit that is upon you, and my words that I have put in your mouth, shall not depart out of your mouth, or out of the mouth of your offspring, or out of the mouth of your children’s offspring,” says the LORD, “from this time forth and forevermore.” 60.1 Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD has risen upon you…. 3 And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising…. 11 Your gates shall be open continually; day and night they shall not be shut, that people may bring to you the wealth of the nations,

with their kings led in procession…. 21 Your people shall all be righteous; they shall possess the land forever, the branch of my planting, the work of my hands, that I might be glorified.

 

That Paul’s quotation in Romans 11.26-27 come from Isaiah 27.9 and 59.20-21 is well recognized.  By providing some of the verses around what Paul quotes, however, I hope to show that there is more to the link than just what Paul quotes.  Several theological points overlap in the passages:

  1. Both passages have in view Jacob’s (Israel’s) sin
  2. Both passages have the exile in view: for their sin, the Jews are taken into captivity
  3. Both passages have in view a need for atonement/a Redeemer from Zion
  4. Both passages have in view God’s intervention and restoration of Israel from captivity
  5. Both passages depict Israel’s situation through a metaphor of branches that are dry and broken off or that bloom again

 

The depiction of Israel’s being cut off and possibly later grafted back into the olive tree of God’s people, as well as the Gentiles’ being grafted in, are described at some length in Romans 11.16b-24.  Paul’s metaphor of the branches derives from both of the Isaianic passages.  Also, in Isaiah 59-60, the return from exile includes not only Israel’s redemption but also the inclusion of the Gentiles.  Finally, Isaiah 59.20-21 describes the return from exile as the New Covenant.  As in Ezekiel 36.27, God will put His Spirit in them (Isaiah 59.21).  Isaiah calls this God’s ‘covenant’.  God says that He will put His words in their mouths.

This language of God’s words in the people’s mouths is language derived from Deuteronomy 30.14.  That is, there is a link in Isaiah between the renewal ceremony of Moses at the end of Deuteronomy to the New Covenant.  It turns out to be the same covenant, except that the New Covenant is God’s making the obedience possible.  References to the New Covenant have to do with an internal change that will make the sinful Israelites righteous.  Jeremiah speaks of this as a changing of heart (Jeremiah 31.31-34).  Ezekiel 36.24-27 speaks of a giving of the Spirit of God, as does Isaiah 59.21.  The third image for internal change is God’s words being put into the mouths of the covenant people.

Paul, then, offers a theological interpretation of Deuteronomy 30.12-14 that is consistent with the New Covenant theology of the prophets and that uses language from Deuteronomy 30 that Isaiah picked up in describing the New Covenant.  Paul knows from Deuteronomy 30 that Israel would not obey God’s covenant and that they would go into exile.  Earlier in this chapter, we read:

Deut. 30:1 “And when all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before you, and you call them to mind among all the nations where the LORD your God has driven you, 2 and return to the LORD your God, you and your children, and obey his voice in all that I command you today, with all your heart and with all your soul, 3 then the LORD your God will restore your fortunes and have mercy on you, and he will gather you again from all the peoples where the LORD your God has scattered you.

Thus, for God’s commandments to be easy to obey, God will need to ‘circumcise’ their hearts (Deuteronomy 30.6).  He will first take them into exile for their sins, but He will restore them.  Deuteronomy 30.12-14, then, needs to be read in terms of the New Covenant promise, as Paul indeed does in Romans 10.  This reading is further supported by Paul’s focus in Romans, as we have seen, on Isaiah 59.20-21.  Israel’s sin (e.g., Isaiah 59.7-8), will be answered by the righteousness of God (Isaiah 59.16-17).  For Jacob, cut off for his transgressions in exile, this will mean that God will send His Redeemer from Zion (Isaiah 59.20), or, as Isaiah 27.9 says, to provide an atonement for sin. 

The restoration from exile in sin that both Isaiah 27 and Isaiah 59-60 have in view, then, is the basis for Paul’s hope that ‘all Israel will be saved’ (Romans 11.26).  Paul bases his hope for the covenant people to be restored on the prophetic hope of a return from exile.  Whether or not Israel actually returned from exile (and most did not), the theological exile in sin was still the case.  Thus, a fulfillment of Old Testament promises of a return from exile for Israel is still held out as a promise yet to come.  Paul avoids predicting this; his comments are interpretive of the two Isaianic texts.  Paul does not, as some people have oddly suggested, imagine that Israel can come to God in their own way and not through the Redeemer, Jesus Christ.[7]  His hope is that the God of mercy has not rejected His people but will some day restore them from their sins, including their being ‘cut off from Christ’, which is their true exile.  The God who has consigned all to disobedience that He might have mercy on them all (Romans 11.32) is the God who can yet restore the children of the covenant from exile in their sins and rejection of the Redeemer who redeems Jacob from all his transgressions, bringing them into the New Covenant established through Jesus Christ.  This has nothing to do with national Israel, with a country, with a geographical region, with reestablishing Temple worship in Jerusalem, and so forth.  Paul’s points are theological and have to do with the people.  ‘Exile’ is understood not geographically but theologically.

The ‘partial hardening’ of Israel (Romans 11.25) is a mystery in God’s plan.  The language of ‘mystery’ relates to the deep working of God through time to accomplish His purposes.  God’s calling, as Paul showed in chapter 9, serves His plan for salvation.  As Pharaoh’s hardening against Israel served God’s plan to save Israel (Romans 9.17-18), so also Israel’s hardening serves to bring the Gentiles into God’s plan (Romans 11.25).  While Paul does not explain these things, it is possible to understand this.  Had Pharaoh’s heart not been hardened, Israel’s departure from Egypt would not have been a show of God’s power and mercy.  Had Israel not gone into exile for her sins, her deliverance would not have been a show of God’s power and mercy when He redeemed them from exile.  Had Israel’s heart not been hardened to the righteousness from God in Jesus Christ, their religion would have remained an ethnic religion—as it is today—and not been opened up to the Gentiles.  Prophetic passages, particularly in Isaiah, offered the view that the Gentiles would be included in God’s plan when Israel would be restored from captivity.  Paul explains further how the Gentile inclusion occurs while Israel is still in theological exile from God by rejecting His righteousness in Christ Jesus.  Their full number will then mean the return from the ‘exile’ from faith in Jesus.

Thus, Paul’s understanding of who God is—the God of all mercy—is the basis for his hope that ‘all Israel’ will be saved.  This is not some trite statement that some Jews through history turn to Christ Jesus.  (That was the case in Paul’s own day—in his own life—and yet this was not the answer Paul was looking for in Romans 9-11.)  It is not a statement that the Church has replaced Israel, or that Gentiles have replaced the Jews.  It is not a notion that there might be a different path of salvation apart from Christ—the Jews’ rejection of Christ in Paul’s day was precisely the problem Paul is addressing to a church in Rome that had both Jews and Gentiles in it.  Paul’s theological conviction of God’s mercy leads him to say that God is not yet finished with his plan of salvation.  One day, there will be a massive return of Israel from captivity in their sins, when they are no longer in exile from Christ.[8]  This will signal the coming of the day of resurrection:

Rom. 11:15 For if their rejection means the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead?

Paul’s version of the prayer, ‘Maranatha,’ ‘Come, Lord Jesus,’ was to pray for God’s covenant people with tears to accept Jesus Christ, God’s atonement for sin, His Redeemer from Zion who takes away the transgressions of Jacob.  He says,

Rom. 9.2-3 I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers,1 my kinsmen according to the flesh.

and

Rom. 10.1 Brothers, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved.

The hope that Paul has that his prayer will be answered is first in the character of God.  God is merciful.  This is the heart of the Gospel.  Second, his hope rests in his understanding of prophecy about the New Covenant, which allows him to read Deuteronomy 30.12-14 in light of Isaiah 59.20-21 and in regard to Christ Jesus, who established the New Covenant through His blood shed for us on the cross.



[1] Paul’s introduction, ‘Do not say in your heart,’ comes from Deuteronomy 9.4.  By drawing the reader’s attention to Deuteronomy 9 before interpreting Deuteronomy 30.12-14, Paul manages to provide a lens for his interpretation of the latter passage.  Deuteronomy 9 repeatedly emphasizes that Israel will not enter the land of promise because of their own righteousness.  Obedience to the Law is not the basis of God’s blessing.

[2] Paul combines wording from Psalm 107.26 (ET) here to change Deuteronomy 30.13’s ‘,’ to ‘down to the abyss’: ‘they mounted up to heaven; they went down to the depths’ (ESV).  Ps. 107 speaks of those who were fools in their sinful ways (v. 17) who then cried to the LORD (v. 19).  The LORD then ‘sent out his word and healed them’ (v. 20).  As with Isaiah 27 and 59, the help for sinners comes from God (as opposed to greater effort to obey the Law).  Paul’s interpretation combining such texts is in keeping with the theological point of each text.

[3] This is the emphasis, e.g., in Frank Thielman, Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2018), pp. 491-493. Similarly in Jewett and Seifrid (see footnote 4).

[4] Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2996), p. 652.

[5] Frank Thielman, From Plight to Solution: A Jewish Framework for Understanding Paul’s View of the Law in Galatians and Romans (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1989), pp. 113-114.

[6] There have been a variety of interpretations of Romans 10.6-9.  Good discussion may be found in Robert Jewett, pp. 625-629; Douglas Moo, Romans, pp. 650-657.Robert Jewett, Romans, Hermeneia (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007); See Mark Seifrid, ‘Romans,’ in Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, eds. G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007)., pp. 607-694, esp. 656-659.  However, none of these take Isaiah 59.20-21 into consideration in Paul’s use of Deuteronomy 30.12-14, and they do not connect this understanding to what Paul says in Romans 11.25-27.

[7] E.g., Krister Stendahl says that Romans 9-11 is the climax of Romans and that it is about ‘the relation of the two communities [church and synagogue or Jewish people] and their coexistence in the mysterious plan of God..’  Stendahl emphasizes that the Jews’ salvation is not about accepting Jesus as the Messiah.  See Paul Among Jews and Gentiles, and Other Essays (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1976), p. 4.  In response, one might note that Paul does not believe that the Jews are being saved at the present time (Rom. 10.1) and that they have zeal for God but no knowledge of the righteousness of God (Rom. 10.2-3).  This righteousness of God, Paul earlier laid out clearly, is ‘through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe’ (Rom. 3.22).

[8] The position on this issue that is offered here is well represented in scholarship.  James D. G. Dunn, for example, argues a related view that the ‘mystery’ of ‘all Israel’ coming to salvation involves the hardening of literal Israel, the entrance of the full number of the Gentiles, and then mercy shown to literal Israel again (Rom. 11.31).  Dunn then notes that this view is consistent with the point of a number of Old Testament texts: Ps. 22.27-31; 86.9; Is. 2.2-3; 25.6-8; 56.3-8; 66.18-23; Mic. 4.1-2; Zeph. 3.8-11; Zech. 2.10-12; 14.16-17.  He also notes some apocryphal texts, but we might add that there are a number of other passages that might be listed—not least the passage noted in this article of Isaiah 59.20-60.22.  See Dunn,  The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006), p. 535, n. 10.

No comments:

Return to Eden

 [A short story.] ‘Eve!   Wow!   Wonderful to see you after so long!   My badness, look at you!   How the hell did you get back in here?’   ...

Popular Posts