Skip to main content

Postmodern School Boards and Free Speech

 Why bother with consistency if you have already determined that truth is not restricted by facts but is constructed and personal?  Certain school boards are treating knowledge as opinion and certain opinions as protected, even in contradiction to the facts.  In the postmodern world of make-believe, everything is political--i.e., the management of power in regard to special interest groups.  Even a value, like free speech, is politicised.  Thus, its value lies in the use to which it can be put towards political aims (i.e., the desires of a group).  In the following two scenarios, the two school boards are both postmodern in their views and yet contradict each other.  The contradictions are of no concern to postmodern school boards, however, because the laws of logic, like facts, are no longer applicable to arguments that are concerned only with the use to which a value (like free speech) can be employed in favour of a particular group.

Postmodern School Board A: 'Children, you must not wear a T-shirt that states that there are only two genders.'

Responder: 'What about free speech?'

Postmodern School Board A: 'We are not interested in free speech, only offenses to our protected groups.  We are concerned only about your disturbing the emotions of our protected groups' imagined identities.  We, too, imagine that they must be offended by your T-shirt and opposed to your free speech.  Your free speech is offensive, so take off the shirt.'

Responder: 'On the same grounds, may I ask you to remove your rainbow shirts?'

Postmodern School Board A: 'Of course not.  Your group is not protected and therefore has no free speech.'

...

Postmodern School Board B: 'Parents, we support free speech.  We are placing sexually explicit and sexually perverted books in your children's school library.  This is free speech, and we will speak freely to your children without your consent.  If you oppose us, you are in favour of banning books.'

Responder: 'Your role is to teach our children mathematics, reading, science, history, and so forth.  It is not to form them morally--really, immorally--against our' wishes as parents.  You are overstepping your role.  Your free speech undermines parental rights and is thoroughly perverted.'

Postmodern School Board B: 'Frankly, your children belong to us, and you are terrorists.'

Responder: 'Since you are now for free speech and understand it to be used unconditionally without age restrictions or content, would you also include in the school library a book describing ways to commit suicide, how to traffic girls into prostitution, or ways to break into houses?  Or would you ban such books?'

Postmodern School Board B: 'We might.  Free speech is not a universal value.  It neither belongs to everyone nor does it apply to anyone.  It is our speech, and it applies only to what we wish.  If and when we approve of suicide, prostitution, and theft, then our freedom of speech might include such books.  But only when we say so.  For now, free speech means our right to pervert your children with sexually explicit and aberrant material in the school library.'

...

Logically, these two examples of postmodern school boards contradict each other.  However, inasmuch as they are postmodern, logical contradictions and the denial of facts are of no consequence.  The political perspective provides the only consistency.  Power is used to privilege certain social groups and suppress others.  For any still trying to figure out what 'Critical Theory' is, this is it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more