Deuteronomy 10.12-21 and the Nature of Theology

How might we understand theology--its subject, its presuppositions, its characteristics, its hermeneutic, its purpose--from a Biblical perspective?  A step in answering this question, I would suggest, can be found by considering Deuteronomy 10.12-21.  

Deut. 10:12-21  “And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God require of you, but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, 13 and to keep the commandments and statutes of the LORD, which I am commanding you today for your good? 14 Behold, to the LORD your God belong heaven and the heaven of heavens, the earth with all that is in it. 15 Yet the LORD set his heart in love on your fathers and chose their offspring after them, you above all peoples, as you are this day. 16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no longer stubborn. 17 For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the awesome God, who is not partial and takes no bribe. 18 He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing. 19 Love the sojourner, therefore, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt. 20 You shall fear the LORD your God. You shall serve him and hold fast to him, and by his name you shall swear. 21 He is your praise. He is your God, who has done for you these great and terrifying things that your eyes have seen.

The following study brings out six points from this passage about the nature of theology. 

1. Theology begins with God, not us. It is God’s revelation of Himself.

Deut. 10:12   “And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God require of you ….’

What comes before the ‘And now’ that begins our passage?  Prior to this passage, the narrative of Israel’s exodus from Egypt, wilderness wanderings, and impending entry into Canaan is told.  Atop Mt. Sinai, God reveals Himself to Moses and reveals His Law to Israel with the Ten Commandments.  At the base of the mountain, however, the Israelites fashion their own religion, a golden calf.  This was their attempt to produce a contextual theology and worship using the culture and religion of the Ancient Near East. 

Earlier, in Deuteronomy 7, God had warned the Israelites not to make any covenants or marriages with the Canaanites (vv. 2-4).  Upon entering Canaan, they were to break down Canaanite religious altars, pillars, and images (v. 5).  God reminded them, however, that there was nothing special about them that they could bring to the relationship with God.  They were not some numerous nation but freed slaves, simply a people God loved because of the patriarchs (vv. 6-9).  Neither was Israel to come up with their own ethics.  Nor would they succeed in removing the Canaanites because of their righteousness but because of God’s judgement on the Canaanites’ wickedness (9.4-6).  In fact, the Israelites were themselves a rebellious people (9.7).  Without the word mentioned here, the point is God’s grace.  Theology begins with God’s love and grace, not our righteousness or merit.  Theology is the revelation of God, of His glory and grace in dealing with an unworthy, sinful people.

2. Theology is a matter of our relationship with God. 

Deut. 10:12  “And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God require of you, but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, 13 and to keep the commandments and statutes of the LORD, which I am commanding you today for your good?

This relationship with God is described as fear, walking in God’s ways, loving God, serving Him with all our heart and soul, and keeping His commandments and statutes (vv. 12-13, 20).  Theological dogma builds upon this relationship with God.

3. Theology makes universal claims while also being particular.

In his little book, Bible and Mission, Richard Bauckham begins by noting the clash between two universalist cultures: that of globalism and that of Islam.[1]  Britain’s chief rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, spoke out critically against any universalist culture, with its presumptions, imperialism, and institutional powers that threaten anything local, traditional and particular. Bauckham asks if there is not an alternative to universalist cultures on the one hand and the opposite of the particular, relativistic, and constructed truth of postmodern culture.

Bauckham suggests that Christianity based on the Bible offers a hermeneutic for moving from the particular to the universal.  He says, 'Christian communities or individuals are always setting off from the particular as both the Bible and our own situation defines it and following the biblical direction towards the universal that is to be found not apart from but within other particulars.  This is mission' (p. 11). He says that the narrative hermeneutic of the Bible is temporal, spatial, and social (pp. 13-15). It is particular, and yet the Bible’s hermeneutic relates the particular to the universal: temporally Christians anticipate the Lord's return, geographically  Christians proclaim the Gospel throughout the world, and socially Christians see the Gospel proclaimed to every creature.

We see the universal and particular in our passage.  God is, universally speaking, the Creator of all (v. 14).  Yet He is not some generic concept of a creator deity that fits other religions.  He is the only God, and He is the particular God revealed to us in Holy Scripture to His people.  This is the main point of the Pentateuch.  Thus, we read, universally:

14 Behold, to the LORD your God belong heaven and the heaven of heavens, the earth with all that is in it.

And immediately after this we read:

15 Yet the LORD set his heart in love on your fathers and chose their offspring after them, you above all peoples, as you are this day.

The God of Israel is not equal to other gods.  Verse 17 says, ‘For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, the mighty.’  We may use the name ‘God’ as other religions, but we mean this particular and unique God of the Bible.  The God of Israel is not Baal, the God of the Church is the Lord and Father of Jesus Christ and not Zeus or Jupiter.  And the God of Israel in the Old Testament is the same God of the Church in the New Testament.  This particular God works through a particular people: the people of Israel in the OT and the Church in the NT—and He works a universal salvation for all who acknowledge Jesus as Lord.

4. God has one universal standard by which He judges all impartially, yet He acts particularly to bring justice.

Universally, God holds one standard of ethics for all people.  One people’s right is right for all people.  Yet God’s justice is particular.  He cares for those denied justice and judges those benefitting from injustice.  Verses 17-18 say that God

is not partial and takes no bribe. 18 He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing.

God is not partial (v. 17).  He is no ‘respecter of persons.’  He does not ‘lift the face’ to see who is being brought into His court for judgement but renders equal justice to all.  He is no local deity with special justice for one group.  In the post-Christian West that has turned to the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion to remake society by embracing Marxist Critical Theory, ‘equity’ no longer means giving each person equal justice but giving special privileges to certain groups believed to have been victimized and denying equality to others.[2]  Thus, this new kind of equity is a matter of lifting the face to see who has appeared before the new masters.  It is called ‘intersectionality,’ searching for who needs extra weight on the scales of justice.  Consequently, Christian beliefs and values are undermined, while newly invented sexual identities are promoted—even in those once orthodox denominations that are now bound to the culture.  When v. 18 says that God executes justice for the fatherless, widow, and sojourner, it is equal justice, not this new notion of ‘equity' in which disempowered groups believed to have been exploited by unjust persons are grated privileges over others.  Biblical equity is clearly expressed in Leviticus 19.15:

You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor. 

God gives everyone the same justice.[3]

5. So, theology is inseparable from ethics.

The relationship God has with His people establishes them in a covenantal relationship in which they are required to live righteously before Him.  Verse 16 says, ‘Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no longer stubborn.’  God’s people are not only told what God’s statutes are; they also learn ethics from observing God and from their lived narrative and relationship with God.  Verses 19-20 say,

Love the sojourner, therefore, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt. 20 You shall fear the LORD your God. You shall serve him and hold fast to him, and by his name you shall swear.

6. Theology becomes doxology.

There is no passive consideration of the great truths of our faith.  Through it, we are brought to worship.  Verse 21 says, ‘He is your praise.’  How different from other religions.  God is known by us because He is at work in us and for us.  The verse continues,

He is your God, who has done for you these great and terrifying things that your eyes have seen.

These great things God does come to their head in the salvation He works for us through the cross of Jesus Christ.  And seeing God active in space and time and in our lives, we respond in praise.  Such is the relationship we have with God, who stands behind and above and before our theology.  Theology becomes doxology: God is our praise.



[1] Richard Bauckham, Bible and Mission: Christian Witness in a Postmodern World (Carlisle: Paternoster Press and Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 2003).

[2] Cf. Rollin G. Grams, ‘About Those New Western Values—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion,’ Bible and Mission Blog (17 December, 2021); https://bibleandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/about-those-new-western-valuesdiversity.html (accessed 8 June, 2023).

[3] Cf. Rollin G. Grams, ‘Biblical vs. Contemporary Notions of “Equity” in Social Justice,’ Bible and Mission Blog (15 March, 2022); https://bibleandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/biblical-vs-contemporary-notions-of.html (accessed 8 June, 2023).


No comments:

Return to Eden

 [A short story.] ‘Eve!   Wow!   Wonderful to see you after so long!   My badness, look at you!   How the hell did you get back in here?’   ...

Popular Posts