Skip to main content

What Enticed Israel to ‘Go After Other Gods’? Part 1

Introduction

In this and the next several posts, I intend to explore the question, ‘What Enticed Israel to Go After Other Gods?’ The Old Testament reads as a multi-author, historical record over hundreds of years about Israel going after other gods.  It is also a theological study, looking into why Israel was so enticed. 

While this series of studies will focus on the Old Testament, lessons for today are clear.  ‘What Entices Christians to Go After Our Changing Culture?’  Some in our day have actually recommended a purposeful inclusion of other religions—even in the churches—and a blessing of post-Christian sexual practices.  We have many lessons to learn, then, from a study of the Old Testament on this question.  They remind us of what it means to be God's holy, treasured possession in the world.

Part 1: The pressure and desire to be like other nations

The narrative of Israel’s desire to be like other nations began concurrently with God calling her to be a separated people unto Himself at Mt. Sinai.  While Moses was receiving God’s Ten Commandments, the rest of Israel was forming a typical Ancient Near Eastern religion with the symbol of a golden calf.  Yahwism was an exclusive religion.  Israel’s downfall as a nation was in part caused by not removing the Canaanites from the land (Deuteronomy 7.16).  Politically, Israel’s desire to be like other nations included having a king (1 Samuel 8.5, 20).

Israel, however, was not to be like other nations.  God would go before them to remove the Canaanite tribes, and Israel was not to bow down to and serve their gods (Exodus 23.23-24).  God warned Israel that they should ‘not learn to follow the abominable ways practices of those nations’ (Deuteronomy 18.9).  He said,

take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ 31 You shall not worship the LORD your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the LORD hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods (12.30-31).

Israel repeatedly forsook exclusive devotion to YHWH.  Hosea speaks of Israel going after her lovers like an unfaithful wife.  Ezekiel 16 makes the same accusation.  This gives a different focus from being pressured to be like other nations as Israel was actively courting relationships with them while rejecting God.

The reason that God allowed Israel to be defeated by the Assyrians and be taken into exile was their despising His statutes and covenant to go after false idols and ‘follow the nations that were around them’ (2 Kings 17.15).  They ‘walked in the customs of the nations whom the LORD drove out before the people of Israel, and in the customs that the kings of Israel had practiced' (17.8).  These customs included idol worship, burning their sons and daughters as offerings, practicing divination and omens, and selling themselves to do evil (17.17).

In addition to religious syncretism, Canaanite and Egyptian sexual practices were also forbidden to God’s holy people.  Leviticus 18 begins with God saying, ‘You shall not do as they do in the land of Egypt, where you lived, and you shall not do as they do in the land of Canaan…’ (v. 3).  The rest of the chapter lists various forbidden kinship, sexual relations, homosexual acts (v. 22), bestiality (v. 23), and sacrificially offering their children to the god Molech (v. 21).  God says that the reason He removed the Canaanites from the land and gave it to Israel was that they had made the land unclean (v. 25).  The same would happen to Israel when, instead of being different from the Canaanites, they adopted their religious and sexual abominations.

This is a basic storyline for the whole Old Testament.  The cycle of Israel’s sin, punishment, and redemption by God runs through many stories and the history of Israel.  From that basic story develops the theology and ethics of the Old Testament.  At the beginning of Israel’s history, when she was made by God to be His own treasured possession and holy people with His commandments and with a land of their own, God warned them not to yield to cultural pressure and not to desire to be like the other nations.  At the end of Israel’s history, they, like the Canaanites, were removed from the land.  They had rejected God’s commandments and followed the ways of the Canaanites before them.

The lesson is one that rings true in every age.  Will the people of God follow God’s statutes or the customs of culture?  In our day, countries in the West have rejected centuries if not millennia of Christianisation.  In its place, is coming a persecution of Christians for not submitting to the reigning cultural practices and new laws.  The culture has also set up new practices regarding sexuality.  This first came with the profligacy (sexual immorality) of the 1960s, followed by the anti-naturalism of the 2010s (homosexuality, followed by transgenderism, gender fluidity, etc.).  That many in the ‘Church’ have succumbed to the pressure of the culture should be no surprise to those who have learned the lessons of Israel in the Old Testament.  It is what happens.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more