Skip to main content

Scotland's Proposed Ban on 'Conversion Therapy'

Scotland's government has sought to ban so-called 'conversion therapy' for it considers such practice harmful.  Anyone intending to help someone change sexual orientation or gender identity would receive a hefty fine and possibly prison.

While the liberal Church of Scotland is in general agreement with the proposed ban, the Roman Catholic and 'other' churches are not because of religious freedom and the rights of parents. Indeed, opposition to 'conversion' itself seems to be at issue.  The Good News of the Gospel is good news because God's salvation has come to us, making it possible for us to convert.  It has come to us in proclamation by ministers of the Gospel, to be sure, but the Gospel itself is the news that God has sent Jesus Christ to deliver us from our sins and the power of sin over our lives.  The Good News is that we are being converted.

Paul's explanation of conversion involves the necessity that some are sent to those who do not know the Good News, that they preach the Good News, and that those who hear come to believe the Good News:

How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? 15 And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” (Romans 10.14-15, ESV).

The very basis of Christian teaching is faith, not coercion, but coming to faith is conversion nonetheless, and the preaching of faith has the intent of people converting.  Indeed, Christians would urge ministers of the government to convert to the Christian faith themselves.

The infringement on parents' rights is also a significant problem with the proposed ban.  The assumed authority of the government over the parents in the raising of children is indefensible.  After centuries of Scotland affirming Christian faith, Catholic or Protestant, the current government is about to fine and imprison those who affirm the Church's teaching in the Scriptures and throughout its history.  Christian parents are suddenly to be viewed as child abusers.

The Evangelical Alliance, for its part, is concerned that this ban proceeds from the premise that Christian teaching on sexuality is harmful.  They are quite right.  In speaking about the dramatic conversion of practices witnessed in the Corinthian Church that he established, Paul says,

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified [made righteous] in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6.9-11).

Two words are unfortunately collapsed by the ESV translation into the single word 'homosexuality'.  This was a translation error of significant magnitude.  The Greek has 'μαλακοὶ and ἀρσενοκοῖται', that is, 'soft men’ and ‘men practicing homosexual acts with each other'.  The term 'soft men' would refer to men identifying as women, since the word 'soft' was used of women in general and of men claiming and practicing a female orientation.  The second term is a direct reference to Leviticus 20.13, which condemns both men involved in homosexual acts with one another (cf. Leviticus 18.22).  The Apostle Paul's teaching is not innovative: it affirms God's Law regarding homosexuality (cf. also Romans 1.26-28; 1 Timothy 1.10).

The Scottish government's proposal would incarcerate Paul and fine him.  Paul, however, saw Christian conversion not only as a change of beliefs and attitudes but also of practices and orientations.  Conversion is described as a cleansing--'washed', as a separation unto holiness from unholy living--'sanctified', and a person being 'made righteous' (this is the better translation here of what the ESV, following other English translations, renders as 'justified').

The debate about 'conversion therapy' is peculiar from a Christian standpoint.  One of the problems that has arisen within the Church over the past century is the idea that pastoral care and counselling are therapeutic, sharing much in common with psychological therapy.  The truth is that pastoral care is grounded in Scriptural teaching.  Therapeutic counselling today seeks to help clients live authentically and healthily, largely by living true to their own convictions and orientations.  Pastoral counselling fails if it does not point out what God's Holy Word declares as truth, often over against what individuals believe or desire.  It is not about affirming the client but affirming Scripture, and thereby offering divine help to others.  Moreover, Christian pastoral care declares that the Gospel is a 'power' for salvation (Romans 1.16).  This power is indicated in the transformation of sinners and in the divine work mentioned in the quotation above of 1 Corinthians 6.11: 'in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God'.  Therapy is human counselling; pastoral care is Scriptural counselling and a ministry in the power of God.  Christianity invites people to faith because faith is faith, believing, not submission (as in Islam).  It is not faith if it is coerced.

Consider the occasion when a father brought his son to Jesus' disciples and asked them to heal the boy. The boy suffered from seizures and fell into the fire or water, injuring himself. The disciples were unable to heal the boy.  When Jesus later delivered the boy from a demon, he was healed instantly (Matthew 17.14-18).  This story--and others like it--attribute a spiritual cause to a physical ailment.  It accepts that a spiritual power must be confronted to deliver the boy from a situation that is accepted as harmful.  Christians see other situations in a similar light.  Indeed, Graeco-Roman writings that have no contact with Christianity understood the power of desire that drove people into debauchery and profligacy in various types of indulgences.  Graeco-Roman philosophy addressed ways to master temptation, to practice the virtue of self-control or temperance.  It recognised that, while some people willfully chose such lifestyles, others found themselves controlled by desire despite their will.  Christians taught that such exercises were futile as the problem went much deeper than what such therapeutic practices might address (cf. Colossians 2.20-23).  Paul well understood this: only by the power of God can people be released from the bondage of the will to sin.  A person living under the power of sin says, 

For I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate.  For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me (Romans 7.15).

The Christian is not left in this condition, however, because conversion means transformation by the work of the Holy Spirit.  A few verses later, Paul speaks to the Christian: 'For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death' (Romans 8.2).

This is conversion.  It is not therapy.  Indwelling sin is not extricated through human efforts but by the work of God.  If by therapy we mean some practical tips on how to live better, well and good, but only by the grace of God--His powerful, transforming grace at work in us--can we break free from the shackles of sin and live in obedience to God (cf. Romans 6).  Paul speaks of the Word of God that is 'at work in you believers' (1 Thessalonians 2.13).  God has begun a good work in us and will bring it to completion when Jesus Christ returns (Philippians 1.6).  We are God's 'workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works' (Ephesians 2.10).  Paul says, 

Therefore, if anyone is in Christ Jesus, he is a new creation.  The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.  All this is from God, who through Christ Jesus reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation....We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God (2 Corinthians 5.17-20).

God is in the conversion business, and He has entrusted to His people this ministry as well.  It is no therapy, but it is radical conversion, spiritual and moral.  It does recognise what God has called sin, whether acts or internal disorders or both.  It does teach right and wrong according to God's Word.  It does call for repentance, transformation, and living a holy life in the power of the Spirit.  May the Scottish ministers and those supporting them in their opposition to the Christian faith themselves experience true conversion.  To convert ones life to God is not coercion but freedom in Christ and by the power of the Holy Spirit at work in us to live the righteous life.  'For through the Spirit, by faith, we ourselves eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness' (Galatians 5.5).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...