Skip to main content

The Heavy Hand of Government and Socio-Economic Exclusion for Christians in the USA

 

‘The government has decided on a new tax on everyone.’

‘A new one?’

‘Yes.  It will be used to set up a grant system to aid farmers.’

‘That sounds very good.  Farmers need this sort of assistance from time to time so that droughts, storms, insect infestations, and the like do not wipe them out.  Anything else?’

‘Well, I don’t suppose people who are not farmers will object.  They will benefit even so: everyone needs to eat!’

‘No, they should not object.’

‘Still, I wonder about the stipulation for acquiring a grant.’

‘And that is…?’

‘If a farmer wants any of the grant money from the government, they must become pig farmers as well as whatever else they farm.’

‘Everyone a pig farmer?’

‘If they want government grant money.’

‘They don’t do enough by growing crops or having cattle or sheep, they also have to have pigs?’

‘Yes.’

‘What if they are Jewish farmers?  Or Muslims?  Or vegans?’

‘Well, they can farm whatever they like, but they won’t get any grant money if they do not raise swine.’

‘That seems like an infringement on people’s beliefs to me.  And it is very heavy-handed.’

‘I was thinking the same thing.  It seems as though such a government has forgotten that here we have government by the people, of the people, and for the people.  They take money from everyone in the form of a tax, and then they offer it to a group that could well use it, but then they withhold it from those whose consciences or religion or even preferences will not allow them to raise pigs.’

‘Surely that is an abuse of power—a coercion against one’s beliefs.  It is not as though the grant is for people to go on holiday.  It is money to be used to keep farmers on their farms and not be wiped out if a plague descends on them.  I just can’t believe that the government can do this.’

‘Well, they aren’t!  I was just getting to see what you thought in principle about something like this!’

‘Why on earth?’

‘Because the government is doing this in medicine.  They are now taxing everyone, giving some of the money to hospitals—we all need hospitals—and then insisting that, whatever else the hospitals do, they must provide medications and surgeries to people who want to change their gender.’

‘But Evangelicals, Orthodox, and Catholics could never do that—it is against their beliefs.’

‘And the government is saying that, despite taking their money in the form of taxes, they can’t have it to provide medical services to those in need unless they do transgender surgeries.’

‘I remember reading this somewhere--oh, here, right on the wall: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

‘That is in the Declaration of Independence.’

‘Ah, of course.  And wasn’t the cause of writing this something like taxation without representation?  We have not only this but also now taxation with coercion against religious beliefs.’

‘Well, one thing is for sure.  The Christians who started this country would find it destructive of the ends for which they established it.’

----- 

For context, see the news on this issue.  E.g., Jack Davis, 'Biden Administration Announces Sweeping Executive Order to Facilitate "Gender Transition" Procedure for Kids,' The Western Journal (15 June, 2024); online https://www.westernjournal.com/biden-administration-announces-sweeping-executive-order-facilitate-gender-transition-procedures-kids/ (accessed 16 June, 2024).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...