Skip to main content

The Heavy Hand of Government and Socio-Economic Exclusion for Christians in the USA

 

‘The government has decided on a new tax on everyone.’

‘A new one?’

‘Yes.  It will be used to set up a grant system to aid farmers.’

‘That sounds very good.  Farmers need this sort of assistance from time to time so that droughts, storms, insect infestations, and the like do not wipe them out.  Anything else?’

‘Well, I don’t suppose people who are not farmers will object.  They will benefit even so: everyone needs to eat!’

‘No, they should not object.’

‘Still, I wonder about the stipulation for acquiring a grant.’

‘And that is…?’

‘If a farmer wants any of the grant money from the government, they must become pig farmers as well as whatever else they farm.’

‘Everyone a pig farmer?’

‘If they want government grant money.’

‘They don’t do enough by growing crops or having cattle or sheep, they also have to have pigs?’

‘Yes.’

‘What if they are Jewish farmers?  Or Muslims?  Or vegans?’

‘Well, they can farm whatever they like, but they won’t get any grant money if they do not raise swine.’

‘That seems like an infringement on people’s beliefs to me.  And it is very heavy-handed.’

‘I was thinking the same thing.  It seems as though such a government has forgotten that here we have government by the people, of the people, and for the people.  They take money from everyone in the form of a tax, and then they offer it to a group that could well use it, but then they withhold it from those whose consciences or religion or even preferences will not allow them to raise pigs.’

‘Surely that is an abuse of power—a coercion against one’s beliefs.  It is not as though the grant is for people to go on holiday.  It is money to be used to keep farmers on their farms and not be wiped out if a plague descends on them.  I just can’t believe that the government can do this.’

‘Well, they aren’t!  I was just getting to see what you thought in principle about something like this!’

‘Why on earth?’

‘Because the government is doing this in medicine.  They are now taxing everyone, giving some of the money to hospitals—we all need hospitals—and then insisting that, whatever else the hospitals do, they must provide medications and surgeries to people who want to change their gender.’

‘But Evangelicals, Orthodox, and Catholics could never do that—it is against their beliefs.’

‘And the government is saying that, despite taking their money in the form of taxes, they can’t have it to provide medical services to those in need unless they do transgender surgeries.’

‘I remember reading this somewhere--oh, here, right on the wall: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

‘That is in the Declaration of Independence.’

‘Ah, of course.  And wasn’t the cause of writing this something like taxation without representation?  We have not only this but also now taxation with coercion against religious beliefs.’

‘Well, one thing is for sure.  The Christians who started this country would find it destructive of the ends for which they established it.’

----- 

For context, see the news on this issue.  E.g., Jack Davis, 'Biden Administration Announces Sweeping Executive Order to Facilitate "Gender Transition" Procedure for Kids,' The Western Journal (15 June, 2024); online https://www.westernjournal.com/biden-administration-announces-sweeping-executive-order-facilitate-gender-transition-procedures-kids/ (accessed 16 June, 2024).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...