Skip to main content

What of Same Sex Attracted, Non-Practicing Ordination Applicants?

 One issue facing Evangelicals today is that of the ordination of same sex attracted, non-practicing individuals.  Gender theory has rattled the Church in many ways, and for Evangelicals, this is perhaps now the primary issue that needs to be resolved.  A denomination will not be able to maintain its unity by not addressing such a matter.  In fact, the issue is about to be brought up next week at the Evangelical Presbyterian Church's General Assembly in the United States.  Evangelicals remaining in the Church of England are allowing same sex attracted yet non-practicing ministers in their ranks.

As this matter faces churches, denominations, and Evangelical groups of various sorts, I would like to bring two of my previous essays to readers' attention:

'Platonists, Stoics, and Paul on Gender Fluidity, "Side B Christians", and "Conversion Therapy"' (see here)

'The Character of Ministers in the Pastoral Epistles' (see here)

At stake are fundamental theological and ethical issues and a proper approach to ordination and to pastoral care.  The issue presents itself as a single matter, but it is intricately connected to other matters of the Christian faith and Christian practice.  It is an issue driven by Western culture and pressured by its powerful institutions.  In the process of coming to a view on the matter, Christians will have addressed their understanding of the Gospel, justification and sanctification, and the nature of Christian ministry.

The topic involves various theological and ethical considerations and is important for the Church to decide rather than leave open.  However, I do not believe it is complicated.  I offer my earlier essays as guidance to a clear view on this matter facing Evangelicals in our day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...