Skip to main content

France's Un-Olympic Games

 

The Olympics celebrates the pinnacle of achievement for the human body.  We exult and are amazed by the speed, endurance, and strength that young people achieve through their natural capacities and strenuous training.  Anyone cheating through the use of drugs is disqualified.  At the Olympics, we only want to see those competing who are playing by the rules of nature.

The Olympics also celebrates the good will of humanity as athletes from different nations compete in friendly competition with one another.  The games can rise above the conflicts of nations.  Even athletes from aggressive nations can compete, though perhaps not as representatives of those nations.  By competing in the games, they rise above the behaviour of their national identities.

The French opening ceremony of the XXXIII Olympics in Paris managed to undermine both of these goals as drag queens parodied the Lord’s Supper, as depicted in Leonardo da Vinci's famous mural.  Instead of nature, they celebrated anti-nature.  Instead of good will, they mocked.  In the name of some distorted notion of freedom, they hailed the freedom to abuse their guests.  In the name of inclusion, they excluded.  The irony of France's position is illustrated in its celebrating men dressed as women while prohibiting Muslim women dressed as Muslims. Whose freedom and inclusion is it?[1]

Contrasting the natural pairing of males and females in the animal kingdom to human homosexuality, the Stoic speaker defending nature in Pseudo-Lucian says,

But you who are wrongly praised for wisdom, you beasts truly contemptible, you humans, by what strange infection have you been brought to lawlessness and incited to outrage each other? With what blind insensibility have you engulfed your souls that you have missed the mark in both directions, avoiding what you ought to pursue, and pursuing what you ought to avoid? If each and every man should choose to emulate such conduct, the human race will come to a complete end.[2]

This work was written by a non-Christian sometime in the 2nd to the 4th c. AD and represents a Graeco-Roman (not Judeo-Christian) debate about whether the love of women or of boys (pederasty) was preferable.  The speaker who wins the debate in this work is the one championing pederasty, not the one arguing for natural love between men and women.  The Christian era in Europe that began to take hold of the culture in the 4th century rejected this, but it is now over.

The culture that has replaced Christianity is not a return to pagan Roman culture but a promotion of what was on the extreme edge of that culture and that Rome actually rejected.  Some commentators on the blasphemous mockery of the Eucharist by drag queens, including the director himself, have claimed that it was actually a presentation of a Bacchanalian feast, as though this makes things better. Bacchus, or Dionysus, was the god of wine, and a prostitution and sex cult was devoted to him. The Roman historian, Livy (59 BC – AD 17), describes it in his 'History of Rome' (bk. 39.8-15). Primarily a cult of women that excluded men in its bestial debauchery (cf. Euripides’ play, Bacchae), Livy says that the cult came to include men who resembled ‘women; actors and pathics [catamites, males used in homosexual intercourse] in the vilest lewdness’ (39.15.9). While the Olympics celebrates the achievements of lives devoted to discipline and exercise, the Bacchic cult celebrates drunkenness, sexual indulgence, and gender dysphoria. The symbolism at the XXXIII Olympics in France, nonetheless, well captures the rejection of Christ for such a god, Bacchus, in contemporary Western society. The harmfulness of Bacchanalian devotion, including sexual slavery and the debauchery of youth, was so great that the Romans outlawed the cult in Italy.

Indeed, the drag queens of Europe have the stage—at least until the Muslims take it not long hence.  Then we will move from mocking gender by men pretending to be women, to subjugating women.  The feminism that erased women’s uniqueness in the name of equality and that went on to allow men into women’s locker rooms and sports will have come full circle with the new religion that subjugates women.  Instead of drag, the veil.  Instead of freedom, submission.  Instead of homosexual marriage, forced marriages.  Yet Europe will need to wait a few decades for that development, though it can be found in sections of certain cities even now.

For those aware of the changing culture, the ceremony was a good depiction of how far removed Europe is from any Christian influence.  Nations observing this Olympics should realise that, whatever Europe is, it is not Christian.  What better than drag queens to represent the distortions of Western culture in its present, post-Christian age?  They are the epitome of the unnatural, even the anti-natural, and they are defined not in themselves but by what they mock, the woman and Christian faith.  Though dressed as women, they cannot bear children.  Yet they seek out children before whom to parade their sexual perversions.  (Indeed, a child was part of the mock feast of debauchery.) They are the grand deconstructors of European cultures that were built more or less on centuries of Christian teaching.  Knowing their enemy, they look for ways to mock Christians’ most holy institution, the Eucharist, while their allies burn a place of Christian worship in France every other week.  They celebrate their sin with a parody of our Lord's commemorative meal of His death for the forgiveness of sins.  Not only so, but bishops of once Christian Churches in Europe and America, now priests of post-Christian culture, offer blessings and even church weddings to homosexuals.  Perhaps the for the most part silence of bishops in churches like the Church of England is because they essentially approve of the progression from the Eucharist to Dionysian revelry.  They have already done so in promoting sexual debauchery in the Church.

And what better country in Europe to host this monstrous celebration?  France has been dismantling Christian faith since the days of its Revolution.  It is the secular state par excellence.  It has now enshrined in its Constitution the right to kill the unborn in the womb—another of the most anti-natural practices of a post-Christian people.  Having cleansed itself from Christian faith in the name of (a twisted notion of) freedom and inclusion, it is now host to another parody of the Christian religion, Islam.  Yet, as the ten percent of the population that is Muslim grows, France will discover (why is this so hard to see now?) that its distorted versions of freedom and inclusivity, not just its Christian past, are about to disappear.  For now, the Olympic drag show announces to the world that the West’s inhospitable inclusivity, its anti-natural freedom, and its mockery of Christianity are in control.  And how better to announce this than by mocking the Olympics, where natural capacities, the differences between men and women, and the awarding of merit are on display in every competition?



[1] Cf. Nadine El-Bawab, 'Controversy surrounds French ban on hijab as 2024 Paris Olympics get underway,' ABC Eyewitness News (27 July, 2024); https://abc11.com/post/paris-olympics-2024-controversy-surrounds-french-ban-hijab/15104952/ (accessed 28 July, 2024).

[2] Pseudo-Lucian, Affairs of the Heart, trans. A. M. Harmon (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925).

Comments

Anonymous said…
Lord have mercy

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...