Skip to main content

Two Notions of the Christian Life: Forgiving and Transforming Grace

 

Introduction

I would like to reflect on two ways to speak of the Gospel of our salvation.  The first is the more common way that has to do with justification by grace through faith.  I call this Forgiving Grace.  The second is in terms of understanding and bearing fruit.  I call this Transforming Grace.  (Martin Luther, known particularly for his theology of forgiving grace, nonetheless early on preached a similar message, ‘Two Kinds of Righteousness’.)

Forgiving Grace

So, first, let’s cover familiar territory and speak of justification by grace through faith.  We Christians, particularly we Evangelicals, will very often describe the Christian life by speaking of God’s saving us by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, our Saviour.  When we explain what it means for Jesus to be our Saviour, we continue with saying that Jesus’ death on the cross was for our sins, a free gift from God to people still in their sins.  We cannot earn our salvation.  We are not ‘good enough’ for God to give us a pass.  Instead, as Paul says in Ephesians 2.4-5, ‘God, being rich in mercy, because of the great mercy with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved’ (ESV, and throughout).

Now, this is, indeed, the Gospel, the Good News.  It is not only a message in the New Testament, as though the Old Testament was a book of Law and the New Testament a book of Grace.  The Old Testament again and again points Israelites to God’s grace and salvation and the need to have faith in Him, not in our own righteousness.  The New Testament part of the Gospel is simply in saying that God’s grace, His salvation, comes through Jesus Christ, and that our faith in God comes through faith in Jesus Christ as our Saviour.  The whole Bible, Old and New Testaments, proclaim the Gospel: God is our Saviour.

The Book of Psalms regularly points us to this message.  Jews sang of God’s loving kindness, His mercy, His salvation.  Christians sing the same songs, adding that God has revealed Himself in these latter times as kind, merciful, and our Saviour in the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ for our sins.  Notice that this ‘Gospel’ in both testaments is something to sing about, with thanksgiving and joy.  Islam, on the other hand, is a religion that has parasitically fed off of Judaism and Christianity but stripped it of this central message of God’s salvation.  Islam’s notion of God speaks of God being merciful, but only by the power of His will.  The Muslim does not know if God will show mercy or not, and he tries to do good works to receive mercy.  You hear acclamations from Muslims like ‘God is great’, but you do not hear them making melody with praise in their hearts for God’s salvation.  There is no equivalent in Islam to Handel’s Messiah.  There is no high music stemming from the joy of the Gospel and thanksgiving with faith for the God of our salvation.

Transforming Grace

Now, the second way of speaking of the Gospel of salvation is in terms of understanding and bearing fruit.  We need to look at several verses to see this, but first note the different focus these notions place on the Gospel.  This is the same Gospel, having to do with God as Saviour, the work of Jesus Christ, and ourselves as recipients of God’s great work for us.  Yet we will see that explaining salvation in terms of being given a new understanding instead of having faith puts the emphasis on transformation.  What God does is not simply give us something freely, His grace, He changes our way of thinking.  Now, the language of ‘understanding’ and ‘bearing fruit’ are quite a mixed metaphor, as though you sow seeds of understanding and produce a harvest of righteousness.  Still, this is the idea we find in the New Testament, especially in Paul’s writings.  And, just as understanding has to do with transformation, so does the notion of a bearing fruit.  Salvation is not just a gift of grace in the sense of forgiveness of sins; it is now understood more fully as a gift of transforming grace that produces righteousness in us.  This notion of ‘bearing fruit’ is found in both the Old and New Testaments.  Israel was a planted vineyard expected to bear fruit, Isaiah tells us (ch. 5).  Jesus speaks of the need to bear fruit (Matthew 7.13ff), symbolically curses the unfruitful fig tree or the lack of righteousness produced by the temple worship of His day, and says that He is the vine and the disciples are the pruned branches bearing much fruit (John 15.1-6). 

God’s grace, then, is transformative.  First, it helps us recover a right understanding.  Second, it helps us bear the fruit of righteousness.  Notice, then, how Paul puts these thoughts together in several places.  In Philippians 1.9-11 he writes,

Phil. 1:9 And it is my prayer that your love may abound more and more, with knowledge and all discernment, 10 so that you may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ, 11 filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.

Verses like these are theologically rich, but I am only here focusing on the knowledge and fruit expressions of the Christian life.  So, Paul prays for the Philippian believers that their knowledge and discernment would increase.  This is not some general notion of education, as though if we just educated people more they would improve.  In v. 7, Paul has spoken of the Gospel, and knowledge has to do with the Gospel that we have already explained.  It is the Good News of God’s saving grace through Jesus Christ.  Yet this is not just a doctrine, a dogma.  It is a truth, an empowerment, and something that increases in the Christian’s life.  The more we understand it, the more transformative it is in our lives.  In these verses, the particular power of knowledge of the Gospel is that is restores discernment to the sinner.  Paul says, ‘so that you may approve what is excellent’ (v. 10).

Paul says something quite similar in Romans, and we need to bring the beginning and the end of his presentation of the Gospel in Romans together to see this.  In Romans 1.28, Paul says that the problem of human sinfulness led to a greater and greater depravity of our minds.  What does that mean?  It means that we not only did certain things that were sinful—and Paul’s example here are idolatry and homosexuality—but we also began to think that these sins were natural activities, not sinful in the slightest.  Idolatry is a distortion of worship of the Creator, and homosexuality is a distortion of passion for same-sex unions.  Both are examples of the depraved mind, as are other sins that we not only do but also approve (1.29-32).  So, the mind is corrupted and confused.  We might note that, when Psalm 119 celebrates the Law in a lengthy acrostic poem, it celebrates the discernment that God has given sinful humanity in its statutes.  Thus, the giving of the Law is an act of God’s salvation: in it He sets straight the corrupted understanding of a sinful world.  Having explained in various detail the truths of God’s salvation in Romans, Paul comes to a conclusion in Romans 12.1-2.  Notice that the ‘mind’ that was corrupt in 1.28 is now transformed, and notice that discernment—as in Philippians 1.10—has returned, so that we can once again know God’s will.  So, Paul says,

Romans 12:1 I appeal to you therefore, brothers,1 by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.2 Do not be conformed to this world,3 but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.

So, even in Romans—the letter explaining salvation by grace in terms of justification by faith—we have this other way of speaking about the Gospel, its transformation by the renewal of the mind that restores discernment.

I’ve shown how Philippians and Romans explain the Gospel in terms of understanding.  Galatians speaks of the fruit of the Spirit in the Christian life: ‘love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control’ (5.22-23).  Philippians, Ephesians, and Colossians also mention this along with the notion of bearing fruit.

In Ephesians 4.18-24, Paul speaks of how those outside Christ ‘are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart’ (v. 18).  What is the result of this?  He says, ‘They have become callous and have given themselves up to sensuality, greedy to practice every kind of impurity’.  Ignorance expresses itself in ‘sensuality’, which means sexual promiscuity.  Paul says the Ephesian Christians’ former manner of life was ‘corrupt through deceitful desires’, but they have been ‘taught’ in Christ, are renewed in the spirit of [their] minds’, ‘put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness’ (4.23-24).  This is transforming knowledge, and it is what we have already noted in Romans.

The next chapter in Ephesians contrasts the darkness of the mind with the light in the Lord that Christians now have.  He also uses the language of bearing fruit, speaking of the ‘fruit of light’:

Eph. 5:7 Therefore do not become partners with them; 8 for at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light 9 (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), 10 and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord.  11 Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret. 13 But when anything is exposed by the light, it becomes visible, 14 for anything that becomes visible is light. Therefore it says,

            “Awake, O sleeper,

                        and arise from the dead,

             and Christ will shine on you.”

In the very similar letter to Ephesians in Paul’s epistle to the Colossians, these ideas are once again presented as a description of the Christian life.

Col. 1:3 We always thank God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we pray for you, 4 since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love that you have for all the saints 5 because of the hope laid up for you in heaven. Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, 6 which has come to you, as indeed in the whole world it is bearing fruit and increasing—as it also does among you, since the day you heard it and understood the grace of God in truth, 7 just as you learned it from Epaphras our beloved fellow servant. He is a faithful minister of Christ on your behalf 8 and has made known to us your love in the Spirit. 9 And so, from the day we heard, we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, 10 so as to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to him: bearing fruit in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God; 11 being strengthened with all power, according to his glorious might, for all endurance and patience with joy; 12 giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in light.

The notion of the Christian life in terms of understanding and bearing fruit is not only in Paul’s letters.  We also have this in James:

James 3:17 But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere. 18 And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.

Conclusion

Why is this little study important?

1.     Sin has the consequence of distorting people’s understanding.  As Christians, we have a very different understanding, one agreeing with God’s law and purposes in creation.  We will find ourselves debating with people about abortion, homosexuality, euthanasia, marriage, and many such things.

2.     If we only understand the Gospel in terms of justification of the sinner, we will miss the fuller understanding of the Gospel as transformation.  We will find ourselves offering people a Gospel of inclusion without change.  This softness toward sin may even lead some to condone sin, as when people say ‘homosexuals are born that way’ instead of ‘the Gospel brings transformation’.  We need to offer sinners more than forgiveness; we need to offer them the power of the Gospel at work within us to transform us into the image of God in righteousness and holiness (Ephesians 4.23-24).  The ‘born that way’ idea leaves people in the desperation of an internal disorder and truncates the Gospel.  Some have even suggested that the ongoing struggle with a besetting sin, or a desire they do not acknowledge is a sin, is somehow a message of the Gospel: God keeps forgiving.  How very sad not to offer the Gospel as newness of life.  It is like saying Jesus completed His work but never sent the Spirit—the opposite of John 14-16!

3.     Both understandings of Christian life are based on the Gospel of God’s salvation in Jesus Christ.  Notice how a different New Testament author, John, brings together the forgiveness of sins and transformation, using the language of light and darkness, truth, forgiveness, and cleansing. 1 John says,

This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us (1.5-10).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...