Skip to main content

What Are You?

 

What Are You?

 

What are you,

That hates children?

That dismembers them in the womb?

That sends them bruised to hospital beds?

That acts out distortions of womanhood in their libraries

And destroys our daughters’ sports with your fake identities?

That proudly parades your perversions in our streets?

That invades their private spaces?

That sexualizes our little ones

And teaches them your deviancies and abuses?

That sells them deadly drugs

And the lie that they should have butchers cut them into the opposite sex,

Then pumps them with more drugs and pseudo-psychology?

That captures them in the bubble of social media’s echo chamber,

Ever weighing themselves and being weighed by others?

That hides their struggles from their parents?

That ridicules their ethnicity, sex, and religion,

Then tells them they can choose any identity?

That tells them they must not appropriate another culture

Then that their own culture has been cancelled?

That traffics them in bondage to fulfill your lusts?

That kills them in their schools?

That offers no value, no virtue, no meaning,

Just conformity, self-loathing, and manufactured guilt without forgiveness?

Why must you drive our children to suicide?

Why do you teach them the world is made of victims and oppressors, with no heroes?

Why do you twist their thinking,

Saying their history, their race, their gender is wrong?

Why do your minions want our children

When they will not procreate in natural marriage?

What are you

That has emerged from the shadows of darkness and death,

Dressed in borrowed virtues to hide your monstrous scales,

Slithering out from the chaotic, primeval sludge

To play god with our little ones?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...

James Talarico’s Confused Claims about Christian Convictions, and Europe’s Trans-Society

  Texas Democrat candidate for the senate, James Talarico, has ventured into theological territory meant to challenge orthodox views about God and human sexuality. [1]   Trying to challenge the Christian understanding of gender and sexuality, he alleged that God is ‘nonbinary’.   Clarifying his comment, he averred that God is ‘beyond gender’.   These are contradictory claims. To suggest that God is nonbinary is to locate Him in the created order.  When people claim to be ‘nonbinary’, they are making a claim about their sexuality.  Sex, as we should know but also can see from Genesis 1.26ff, has to do with procreation and multiplying the species on the earth.  Those claiming to be nonbinary are claiming sexuality, whatever ‘nonbinary’ sexual identity means to them. Talarico’s second statement is correct: God is beyond gender.  This is because He is beyond the created order.  God is not both male and female.  He has no sexual identity....