Skip to main content

A Classic Theological Curriculum

Introductory Remarks

Having worked over many years in theological education in Africa, Europe, and the United States, I have often been involved in discussions about theological curricula.  I am placing here my view of what should constitute a classic theological curriculum from an orthodox, Evangelical perspective.

Little commentary will be offered, but a few introductory remarks seem necessary.  First, this is proposed for a more British or European approach than an American approach to theological education.  One reason for this is that many countries follow the former model, with its theological training at the bachelor's level rather than the master's level and with a three rather than four-year undergraduate degree.  A further reason for this is that the luxury of an education in most parts of the world cannot dream of a four year undergraduate degree in any subject followed by another three years of a taught master's degree such as the Master of Divinity.  One will find American-based four-year theology degrees in Africa, but this is uneconomical in both time and money.  It is, frankly, uneconomical in America today.  The demise of Bible colleges in America and the increasing control of curricula by the academy rather than the Church has not proved to be successful past the 1980s.

A second introductory remark is needed.  The proposal in this curriculum has to do with a mix of both a classic theology curriculum emphasising content and a pastoral training in practice.  Too often, the weight in ministerial training has fallen on the side of academic study, to the detriment of preparing people for ministry.  The academy governs the curriculum, and the church or denomination is left to provide most of the actual training a new minister needs.  The answer is not one or the other but both.  Nothing is more practical than a solid grounding in Biblical interpretation and theological understanding.  I am convinced that classroom training for ministry practice is far weaker than learning through practice.

Further on this matter, I have often said to colleagues that, if the centre of gravity of the Church has moved to be somewhere in Africa rather than Europe (or the West), then Africa had better be trained in Biblical interpretation and Christian theology.  Knowing and being able to interpret the Scriptures is the fundamental part of theological education, followed closely with training in the theology of the Church.  Such a statement is unapologetically Protestant and Evangelical, although I would suggest that Protestantism and Evangelicalism have in large part rejected their own heritage in this regard and need to recover it.  

In our day, what we often get is a dumbing down of the curriculum, whether because students have not been adequately trained at the high school level or because they are thought to need a more practical course of study.  In non-Western contexts, the argument is often added that something more practical and contextual is needed, as though the Church is a product of the context more than of its historical faith and authoritative Scriptures.  In the West, where students are ill-prepared for academic work in high schools and now colleges, and where 'truth' is understood more locally and functionally, the preference for a non-classical education is noticeable in curricula.  

Some have introduced culture into such a discussion, saying that learning styles are different and should be affirmed in the theological curriculum.  The truth is that education is enculturation.  The girl from Norwich who is sent up to Oxford for her three-year bachelor's degree returns home with a different accent, let alone whatever she has learned.  Education is enculturation, and the question is, 'What sort of culture do we want to teach this group of students?'  A curriculum that does not form students but that just dumps an education into their heads is a failed curriculum.  So much of the failure of the Church in the West has to do with affirming identities rather than educating students in their identity and with accommodations to culture rather than passing on the faith.  These Western failures should not be passed on to the Church in Africa, whether it be Western culture or African culture governing the curriculum.  What is needed is the culture of the Church and all that it requires to be formed as Christians and as ministers.

A third introductory remark is simply that the proposed curriculum is basic and can be altered in various ways.  I have suggested a certification approach in which students are certified in three areas of theological education and ministry.  One could mix these three certificates or teach them one by one.  I have also included a fourth year Bachelor of Theology Honours degree that could stand alone or be integrated with the three-year degree.  Some course substitutions could be made, but the main point of this proposal is to put these particular courses together.  The progression of courses within a certificate, and the possible progression of study if the certificates are mixed, is the sort of detail that a faculty would need to determine for itself.  I would advocate different approaches for different contexts and student populations.  One thing I would say, though, is that theological training should be careful to integrate classroom study with practical ministry experience.  I could see an entire practical training programme running alongside the academic, not just alongside the ministry certificate.

Finally, I have offered two possibilities for a masters' degree.  The reason for including the masters degree options, as well as the B.Th., Honours, is that one has to understand how the part relates to the whole.  The B.Th. degree will need to suffice for most students as their theological education and ministerial training, but it will also need to suffice for students who will continue their studies.

My hope is that, as others do what I have been doing for over thirty years--discussing theological curriculum--this proposal will generate the discussion needed.

B.A. Curriculum

The BTh is offered in three certificate areas.  Students can proceed in all three areas at the same time (recommended).  Each certificate comprises 10 modules.  A fourth year comprises BTh. Honours and is a bridge to further study at the Masters Level.

Certificate in Biblical Studies

The Story of the Bible (a Bible Survey module)

Interpreting the Bible

Pentateuch

Gospels

Historical Books

Paul

Prophets

General Epistles

Psalms and Wisdom Literature

 

Biblical Theology

 

Certificate in Theology

The Christian Faith (a Theology Survey module) I

Doctrines of Scripture, Trinity, Christology, Pneumatology

The Christian Faith (a Theology Survey module) II

Doctrines of Soteriology, Ecclesiology, Eschatology

Biblical and Christian Ethics

Patristic History and Theology

Medieval History and Theology

Reformation History and Theology

Post-Reformation History and Theology

Theological and Ethical Issues Facing the Church Today

Missional and Ministerial Issues Facing the Church Today

 

Certificate in Mission and Ministry

Some modules are offered with practica.  Note that communication (preaching and teaching) is spread out throughout the certificate rather than put into one or two stand-alone courses.  Students should be preaching and/or teaching regularly in the programme.

Didactic Content

Practica

The Life of the Believer (A Survey of the Life of a Follower of Jesus Christ)

Spiritual Disciplines

History and Theology of Christian Ministry and Mission

 

Denominational Distinctives (including polity, liturgy for your denomination)

 

Evangelism and Apologetics

Proclaiming Christian Faith (including preaching)

Church Planting

Church Planting Ministry (including preaching and teaching)

Worship

Worship Practicum (including preaching)

Ministry in the Local Church (children, youth, singles, married, elderly; teaching and preaching; finances)

Ministry Practicum (including teaching)

Church and Culture

 

Ministry of the Church in the World

Serving the Wider Community Practicum

Religions

 

Pastoral Care and Counselling

Pastoral Care and Counselling Practicum

 

B.Th., Honours (4th Year)

The language modules, interpreting the Bible module, and exegesis modules can be taken in lieu of the Certificate in Biblical Studies.  This would allow a student to proceed to the masters level without the bridge course of a B.Th. Honours.  These modules would need to be spread out during the first 3 years.  

The assumption here is that theological studies rests on Biblical authority, content, and interpretation, and so a bridge course needs this Biblical studies focus.  A student in theology, ministry, etc. at the next level will need this foundation in Bible.

Greek I

Greek II

Hebrew I

Hebrew II

Interpreting the Bible with Biblical Languages and in Historical-Cultural Context

Exegesis in the Pentateuch

Exegesis in the Prophets

Exegesis in the Gospels

Exegesis in the Epistles

Biblical Theology and Ethics

 

Masters Degree

The masters degree is offered either as a taught masters in 1 year full-time or as a research masters in 1 year full-time.

The taught masters degree involves mastery of subject areas and work in primary sources.  Each module combines study in Old Testament, New Testament, Church History, and Theology.  Each module also involves a ministry practicum.

Didactic

Practica

The Gospel

Evangelism and Preaching

Christology

Teaching a course on Jesus/Christology

Soteriology

Teaching a course on Salvation

Pneumatology

Individual or Cohort Spiritual Retreat

Ecclesiology

Ministry in a local Church

Missions

Ministry in Church Planting, Bible Translation, Cross-Cultural Teaching of Bible/Theology, Engagement with other religion/s

Christian Relief and Development

Work with a Christian Relief/Development Ministry

Local Church Ministry I (different age groups)

Practicum in this area

Local Church Ministry II (worship, business)

Practicum in this area

Guided Research in a Subject

 

The research masters degree may be completed in one of the following fields, given the prior preparation of students to a high standard and the availability of supervisors:

·       Old Testament
·       New Testament
·       Bible
·       Theology
·       Church History
·       Ethics
·       Missions
·       Ministry


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...