Skip to main content

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

 An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.  We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.  The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.  They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.  It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.  We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines.

Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.  If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.  These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.  They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.  They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.  They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of virtues that render them vices while still claiming to hold the virtuous middle.  They have floated to the surface of a culture once otherwise arranged.  They are not alien but new in their order and new in their definitions.  They are familiar, like cousins come to claim our inheritance.

Freedom, that supreme virtue of the West, has been with us for some time.  It stepped forward a mighty warrior in oppressive times.  Yet it is now twisted backwards on itself, a freedom from, an independence, a self-rule, suited only to fight tyranny but not to advance goodness.  It falters as our leader, unable to direct us in a freedom to, a responsibility.  It knows no company with love.  It grants the other her wishes, only to censure oneself.  It surrenders the public square to the paranoid and delusional.

Freedom’s companion virtue is equality, a noble virtue that restrains one's selfish desires.  Equality stretches its arms out wide to the ends of the earth.  It smiles upon the poor seeking equality before the Law.  It teaches that each individual has intrinsic worth.  Equality lies at the root of Biblical justice.  Yet this equality has been seized by ruthless warriors.  Its noble appearance is grotesquely altered.  It is now a new 'virtue', a new 'equity'.  Equity once meant raising up the oppressed to give them equal justice.  It has become the banditry of Robin Hood, taking from one to give preferential treatment to others.  It cloaks itself in pious clothing, ‘God is on the side of the poor' goes the mantra—but in demanding preferential treatment rather than equal justice.  The blind judge is led away.  Justice peeks through its blindfold of equality to see who is on trial, to punish people by their class identities and not their crimes.  Social justice warriors gain the high ground of virtue.  The claim of victimhood diminishes the crime and receives preferential treatment.

How sinister is equity's companion, diversity, a virtue for the undoing of a whole civilization.  Even the notion of 'civilisation' is rejected.  There is no progression of culture, no building of civilisation, only cancellation of the whole past for its crimes.  There is no valuation of culture when multiculturalism is the value.  Yet for anyone past who once held the keys to the halls of civilization, there is no forgiveness.  For the Jacobites in control, repentance before execution is demanded, but no forgiveness, no grace, no mercy, and certainly no appreciation for anything is given at the guillotine.  Multiculturalism, multi-faith, ecumenism, religious co-existence, no citizenship, no borders, no boundaries, no laws, no punishment—the policies of diversity.

Inclusion, so welcoming a virtue, always wears a smile.  It arrives with diversity and equity to deconstruct a civilization.  The Dark Riders have come into the Shire.  That word, ‘civilization’, is itself rejected—beheaded, shall we say.  Everyone speaks instead of ‘culture’, and this is a holy word.  There are no longer any failed cultures other than Western culture, the cultures of the West lumped into one culture.  All other cultures are valued, revered as creative gifts to the human enterprise.  Babel is again being built: the achievement of humanity all together, but now as a multicultural rather than monocultural project.  Multiculturalism is celebrated as cultural strength.  Whisper nothing bad about your neighbour.  Everyone’s god is treated as the same god, but never claim God to be the only One revealed in Scripture.  To this the last pope himself bowed the knee.  The King of England too.

Humility, that great Christian virtue, has become self-deprecation, the tool of deconstruction.  It appeared first in the Christian clothing of 'reconciliation' in post-Apartheid South Africa, where one acknowledged and stated one's acts, one's crimes, and was then forgiven.  It then became self-deprecation, the grovelling of a people before the new powers, ever begging for forgiveness at the doors of the church but never admitted to the Eucharist.  Thirty years on from Apartheid, South Africa is still interpreted in light of it: one never moves on.

All are welcome through our gates, our walls are torn down, our parents' tombstones ground to dust.  Humility has become humiliation, our own self-loathing.  We have mistaken seeing others better than ourselves as a way of service for seeing ourselves as worthless for service.  We have nothing to offer our invaders but the throne.  God’s grace is not for salvation, His mercy not for forgiveness, His love not for sacrifice.  They are no longer necessary.  They are dismissed.  The problem was not our sin but our parents calling our behaviour sin.  All are now welcome as they are, who they are, with whatever they bring, however they come, unrepentant, unchanged.  The Gospel is not about the justification of the sinner but the affirmation of the sinner as a welcome guest, indeed, a new neighbour.  Someone who needs no saving needs no grace, who has not sinned needs no forgiveness, who is simply loved needs no sacrifice for sin.  If Jesus is not exiled, He is made to sit in silence at our inclusive table, humiliated for giving too much for an unnecessary cause.  Why did you die on the cross?  Not for our sins.  Why did your Father let you die for nothing?

Honour is not achieved through obedience but self-expression.  The knight has no code, no chivalry.  There is no law but that to oneself.  Even nature is outraged. We reject the Creator and set up idols to meet our every desire, and our desires are internally disordered against our Creator.  We are Mankind, a god to ourselves.  We are not slaves to our passions and desires but eagerly pursue them.  They define us.  We honour ourselves by making our own world, forming our own essence from mere existence.  When there is no pattern to follow, honour is given for any edifice we erect.  What limit is their to what we can achieve when achievement is whatever we claim it to be?  We hand out participation trophies for there are no winners.

We have turned love, that cardinal Christian virtue, into desire, joy into pleasure, peace into surrender, patience into affirmation, kindness into guilt for micro-aggressions, goodness into a debt owed to victims, faithfulness into progressiveness, gentleness into riotous rebellion, self-control into self-pleasure.  They are the fruit of ourselves, not of the Spirit.  Our virtues are distorted and disordered.

What can alter the course of such a fast-flowing river?  Not love on its own, though the chief of virtues.  Not faith that is blind to truth.  Not hope when we deny the need for salvation.  We bring order with a right understanding of Christian love, faith, and hope.  We correct distortions of true virtue, but only if we know these virtues rightly as Godly virtues.  The love of God, the faithfulness of God, the hope from God correct our moral vision.  Every virtue is defined in Christ Jesus.  We know the love of God in Christ dying for us while we were yet sinners (Romans 5.8).  We know God’s faithfulness in bringing righteousness Himself through Jesus Christ even when we were faithless, for He cannot deny Himself (2 Timothy 2.13).  We know a living hope because Jesus has been raised from the dead (1 Peter 1.3).  Once we understand these virtues of love, faith, and hope rightly we can order the other virtues rightly and restore order to our disordered selves.

The sun rises, the mist disappears, and we see the landscape clearly.  We were once darkness, but are now light in the Lord (Ephesians 5.8).  ‘Awake, O Sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you’ (5.14).  For a culture covered in the mists of self-adoration, let us ‘Lift high the cross, the love of Christ proclaim, till all the world adore His sacred name.’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...