Skip to main content

The Pursuit of Greatness: the Disciples of Jesus versus the Spartans (Mark 10.42-45)

One cause of slavery in ancient Greece was, in the case of Sparta, a complex interplay between political structure, economic pressures, and military intentions.  The Lacedaemonians (i.e., the Spartans), as Polybius explains in his Histories, were a militaristic and warlike nation.  Yet they were hindered in pursuits of glory by the very constitution that their lawgiver, Lycurgus, had established.  

To be sure, it was an excellent constitution, claims Polybius, for self-containment and freedom within their own Peloponnesian territory.  Yet it failed to enable the nation's expansionist inclinations.  A key hindrance for Sparta was the restriction that no one of them could own more property than another (Polybius, Histories VI.45.3).  Also, they eschewed money-making (VI.45.4).  As Polybius observes, this limited their ability to create wealth, and, instead of fostering the virtue of self-control, their covetousness turned to war and the enslavement of others (VI.49.1). What the Spartans needed was a supply of grain and labor that freed them to pursue their bellicose endeavors and rise to greatness as a regional power.  Thus, they annexed the territory of their neighbors, the Messenians, and reduced them to working as serfs on their own land.  The Spartans’ ambitions, their consideration that it was more glorious to rule and lord it over others than simply to be content in their own freedom, required a servile class (VI.50.3).

Polybius' analysis of the political, economic, and military characteristics of ancient Sparta in the 8th/7th c. BC offers a splendid example of what Jesus says about the pursuit of greatness in Mark 10.42-45.  He no doubt had more than the Spartans in view, but they provide a fine example of those who pursue greatness in a way contrary to Jesus.  Jesus replied to certain of his glory-seeking disciples that, indeed, the ‘rulers of the Gentiles do lord it over’ others.  His disciples, however, were to serve others: ‘and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all.’  For the Spartans, the irony of greatness was that it required enslaving their neighbors.  For Jesus, the irony of greatness was that it involved being a slave of all. 

Jesus himself provided the example: ‘For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many’ (v. 45).  Instead of enslaving others, he served others, offering himself as a ransom for the freedom of those who were enslaved.  Such greatness was a greatness far beyond what the Spartans achieved, but it came at the cost of his own life to ransom those enslaved in sin, as we also know from the various early Church authors writing about the significance of Jesus’ death.  The politics, economics, and aspirations of the Church were counter-cultural or antithetical to the world’s, with the latter's desire for power and authority that allowed the enslavement of others to achieve their ends.  Jesus’ disciples were to become great through a ‘slavery’ of service in imitation of their Lord.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...