Skip to main content

Open Letter to First Lady Michelle Obama about Abortion and 'Womxn'

 Dear First Lady Michelle Obama,

So much discussion about abortion is in the news today in anticipation of a Supreme Court decision that is expected to return legislation on abortion to the states.  In this regard, I note with regret your comment, "State lawmakers will have the power to strip womxn [xic] of the right to make decisions about their bodies and their healthcare."  Might I briefly clarify four matters of biology?

First, a child in the womb has a different, though related, DNA from the mother.  Therefore, a choice to abort the child is not a choice about the mother's body so much as about her son's or daughter's body.  The child inherits one chromosome from each parent, making a separate individual.  Any decision to take the life of the unborn child is a decision about the child's life.  Stripping a woman from the so-called 'right' to make decisions about terminating someone else's life is hardly a decision about her own body.  Incidentally, even in the case of two persons with identical or nearly identical DNA--i.e., identical twins--the persons are not one person.  An identical twin cannot and should not be able to choose to terminate the life of his or her sibling.  Mothers share even less DNA with their children.

Second, DNA establishes gender.  A baby girl inherits an X chromosome from the father and an X chromosome from the mother.  A baby boy inherits an X chromosome from his mother and a Y chromosome from his father.  There are no other chromosomes or combinations, and so there are no other genders.  Girls have XX chromosomes, and boys have XY chromosomes.

Third, the chromosomes determine the gender, reproductive organs, and sexual characteristics of the child.  From the moment of conception, a girl with two X chromosomes has what it takes to develop into a child-bearing woman some day.  Boys have what it takes to develop into fathers.  There are no alternatives, such as your 'womxn' category.  Simply put, men do not have babies, and if someone pretending to be a man does, this only reveals that she is a woman, not a man.

Fourth, from the above, it follows that one cannot turn an intention, such as someone's sexual identity choice, into a fact, such as biological sex.  To imagine that this is so involves the same logical fallacy that, if a human being intends to identify as a dog, one actually is a dog.  One's gender identity cannot alter the fact of one's gender, that is, one's biological sex.  You need not worry about the recent invention of a 'womxn' category in all the history of humanity as it has no basis in fact.  As we read in Genesis, 'So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them' (1.27).

The science is both simple and marvelous.  We should follow it because there is no alternative in reality.  I trust this clears up any confusion or misunderstandings.

Sincerely,

Professor Grams


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...
Post a Comment
Read more

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...
Post a Comment
Read more