Skip to main content

The Impending End of Evangelicals in Mainline Denominations

 

We seem, at long last, to have reached the end phase of Evangelicals leaving mainline denominations.

The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Australia voted on 10 May, 2022 on their understanding of marriage.  A Biblical and historical Christian understanding of marriage between a man and a woman was rejected—not by the laity or the clergy but by the bishops in a vote 12-10.  The response of the orthodox Christian bishop and chair of GAFCON Australia, Richard Condie, and the text of the defeated statement on marriage, may be found here.

Various issues arise around this failure of the Anglican bishops, but one is the ongoing fellowship of orthodox Christians with false ‘brothers’—a problem Paul dealt with clearly and decisively in 1 Corinthians 5.  This false partnership has followed every mainline denomination over the past half a century at least, and the result is always the same in the end: after a great loss of membership, the denomination eventually splits.  The purpose of this brief post is to bring an excellent letter on the subject to the attention of readers who might wonder if Biblical concern for ‘unity’ in the Church somehow might mean continuing in the same denomination with persons who promote immorality such as homosexuality and same-sex marriage.  The letter was written in 2011 by Professor Robert Gagnon to a very confused Rev. Dr. Sheldon Sorge, then Pastor to the Pittsburgh Presbytery of the PCUSA denomination.  It may be helpful to those Evangelicals in Anglican dioceses and provinces who mistakenly think that Biblical unity means fellowship with sexually immoral persons calling themselves ‘brothers,’ as Paul says.  Gagnon’s letter, which may be accessed here, is particularly helpful in that it clearly and decisively corrects Sorge’s misuse of several texts in Scripture on the issue of unity.[1]

Most Evangelicals have moved on from this stage of the debate: whether to stay or leave mainline denominations that have changed the doctrine, ethics, and practices of the Church beyond any recognition of Biblical and orthodox Christianity.  Just this month, significant numbers of orthodox believers in the United Methodist Church have separated to form the Global Methodist Church.  This is a move that has come very late, with other denominations having separated from and formed distinct from heretical mainline denominations many years ago.  Some churches are simply ‘stuck’ for various reasons in these denominations, and they continue in a kind of ‘hospice ministry’ within them.  They must not be disparaged or forgotten.  Yet the argument, popular in the 1970s and 1980s, that Evangelicals could somehow bring revival to these denominations by staying in them has long since proven wrong.  This raises the question why some Evangelical seminaries still hire some faculty carrying ordination in mainline denominations like the PCUSA or Episcopal Church—are they really ‘Evangelical’ after all?  No professor should be seen as an independent operator such that his or her denominational affiliation is irrelevant to their ministry.  The process of leaving a denomination for a church or diocese/presbytery, however, is somewhat drawn out, difficult, and emotional, but those who can leave should do so now.  Individuals with no flock to guide who are simply faculty members should have made their exit long ago on the same grounds that Paul lays out in 1 Corinthians 5.  For those with others in their care, Evangelical priests/pastors, bishops, etc., what is urgently needed is unity with each other so that they can separate together and not one by one.

What we are witnessing now is the final part of the first act of separation, and we can only hope and pray for God’s blessing and wisdom for the Global Methodist Church or GAFCON Australia and others.  Only then will the ecclesiastical virtues of faith, love, and hope be free to operate.  The second act began years ago with the formation of new Evangelical denominations or independent Evangelical churches.  For some of these, many challenges have already arisen, including some concerns about orthodoxy.[2]  The third act will either be a refining of ‘Evangelicalism’ to exclude progressives (those compromising Biblical teaching and orthodoxy because of their friendship with the world) and include a more robust ecclesiology around traditional Evangelical tenets, or it will be the failure and demise of Evangelicalism.


[1] Robert Gagnon’s book is a classic, scholarly work on the subject of homosexuality and the Bible.  See The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2002).  See also S. Donald Fortson and Rollin Grams, Unchanging Witness: The Consistent Christian Teaching on Homosexuality in Scripture and Tradition (Nashville, TN: B&H Academic,  2016).

[2] See, e.g., my article, Platonists, Stoicists, and Paul and Gender Fluidity, ‘Side B Christians,’ and ‘Conversion Therapy’; https://bibleandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/platonists-stoics-and-paul-on-gender.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more