Skip to main content

Why Christians Celebrate the Life of the Unborn and Say that Abortion at Any Stage is Wrong

As Christians, our witness to the culture involves speaking and living out our faith in the public square even when the cultural context is opposed to us.  This involves our view about life itself being a gift from God, even before birth.  We have, therefore, remained consistently opposed to abortion through the centuries and distinguished from many cultures on this issue.  (Only in recent times have the post-Christian, mainline denominations (and rebellious individuals like Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi) approved of abortion and other ethical views that are nothing more than an adoption of the present-day culture and a rejection of Scripture, historic Christianity, the Church, and God Himself.)

Various cultures find ways to make killing the innocent morally right, even a moral duty.  The conclusion is what is important; the reasoning is irrelevant--only some path chosen to get there.  Abortion is not merely permitted; it is made into a moral good.  It is justified by the culture, the myths, the politics, and the ethics of a people.  As Isaiah says,

Isaiah 5.20: ‘Woe to those who call evil good

                        and good evil,

             who put darkness for light

                        and light for darkness,

             who put bitter for sweet

                        and sweet for bitter!’ (ESV)

Here are examples of cultures and nations that have called evil concerning children ‘good’.  Their views are captured as statements (not quotations):

Canaan: ‘Our god, Molech, calls for child sacrifices.  Whatever your reason, pass your child through the fire to Molech.  You have a religious reason and right to kill your children.’

Rome: ‘The father has the power of life and death over his slaves and his children.  If he says to kill his newborn child, no law stands in his way.  Leave the child in the hills to die.’

Some Amazonian Tribes: ‘Children born with defects, twins, or triplets are soulless or cursed.  It is right to bury them alive, poison them, or leave them to die.  Kill such children.’

Bassa Komo Tribe, Nigeria: ‘Some children, especially twins, are not human but evil spirits.  They will kill a parent (or both) and are a danger to the community.  They must be killed.

Bolshevik Russia: Laws against abortion are the hypocrisy of the ruling classes.  There is no ethic apart from what the Party dictates.  Lenin allowed abortion; Stalin forbade it, then allowed it.  Do what the Party permits.’

Nazi Germany: ‘Eugenics teaches us that some races are better than others.  No abortion for the master, Aryan race—unless the child is deformed.  Non-Aryan races are encouraged to practice contraception or abortion.’

Communist China: ‘The community is more important than the individual.  One family, one child.  Kill the rest.’

Iceland: ‘Having children with Downs Syndrome is wrong.  We proudly announce we are a nation without such children.  Kill them before they are born.’

Some Americans: ‘Freedom is the primary virtue.  Women must have the right to choose.  It is good and right to kill unborn boys and girls if you so choose;’ Other Americans: 'The unborn are human beings whose life is constitutionally protected.'

We Christians, however, live by God’s Word.  We firstly understand that we are highly valued for what we are, not simply for what we can do (viability, ability to choose, social value).  We are created in His own image and likeness (Genesis 1.26-27; 5.1).  Thus, shedding the blood of any person is the murder of one who is made in God's image (Genesis 9.6).  God commands, ‘You shall not murder’ (Exodus 20.13).  He has taught us to praise Him for His creative work in forming us in the womb, just as in His forming humanity from the earth, saying, 

'For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.  I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.  Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well.  My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth.  Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there were none of them' (Psalm 139.13-16).

We understand that God knows us, as He did the prophet Jeremiah, 'before I formed you in the womb' (Jeremiah 1.5).  God has plans for us before we are born, as Jeremiah says in this verse and Paul says in about his own life in Galatians 1.15.  We understand from Elizabeth's and Mary's meeting that the unborn child can respond to the presence of God (Luke 1.41).  Ever since the 2nd century, Christian authors have recorded the Church's opposition to abortion.

We do not live by the arguments of our cultures.  It is that simple.  We will not take the life of the innocent.  We will not kill the unborn.  Life is a gift from God.  We will not call evil ‘good’.

Nor do we give our support to any who do such a thing or to those who approve of those who do (Romans 1.32).  Our support of innocent life defines us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...