Skip to main content

What is Conversion? A Lesson from St. Augustine

 In 2 Chronicles 7.14, God tells the Israelites that, if they humble themselves, pray, seek His face, and turn from their wicked ways, He will hear from heaven, forgive their sin, and heal their land (from His judgement on them).  'Turning from their wicked ways' is what is meant by 'conversion.'  This lesson will explore conversion further with a look at the conversion of St. Augustine.

As we move from 2 Chronicles to a full Biblical theology of conversion, the means of conversion comes to focus on Jesus Christ.  2 Chronicles pointed to the temple, a place of prayer and sacrifice as the Israelites came to God.  The New Testament replaces the temple with Jesus Christ, whose sacrificial death for us, for our sins, and for salvation made the temple obsolete because its purposes were fulfilled in Him. There is no turning from our wicked ways that will be sufficient for us to stand before God.  If we hope to present our good works to God as the means of our salvation, we will not be justified but condemned.  Any people hoping to buy their way into God’s eternal presence with the currency of their own goodness will find that the exchange rate is not in their favour.  Our wills, not just our actions, are so in bondage to sin that it is not possible not to sin.  We must obey this master, for we are under his rule and authority.  Our only hope is that God has redeemed us through Jesus Christ from such a master and has made us, by His grace, to be His own.

The Hebrew word for ‘repent’, shuv, means ‘to turn.’  This provides us with a good image to understand conversion.  We walk along a certain path in life, one that continues on and on.  If we are happy with that path, we just continue to walk without much thought about the road ahead.  Periodically, there are opportunities to turn and follow another path.  St. Augustine’s conversion shows that conversion involves three steps: a loathing of his/our empty, sinful path, selves, and life; contrition, that is, a deep sorrow and repentance; and a turning to God, or really a surrender to God, with a deep peace and joy.  Augustine understood conversion not simply as a transaction, or a new system of belief, but also and especially as an emotional process of loathing, weeping, and peace and joy in the Lord.

St. Augustine recounts how he became a Christian (in AD 386) in the book that he wrote called The Confessions.[1]  In his words, he tells the story of how God ‘delivered me out of the bonds of carnal desire, wherewith I was most firmly fettered, and out of the drudgery of worldly business’ (Bk. 8.6.13).  There are two obstacles in his life that made him turn to Christ: being chained to passions of the flesh and not being able to master them, and being so engrossed in the business of life as to ignore the things of God.  Augustine wanted more from life, and he came to realize that he would only find this with God’s help.  He tells how he learned of certain people who came to faith as a result of wanting more than what their lives entailed.  He then confesses to God that, as he listened to these testimonies, God

turned me towards myself, taking me from behind my back, where I had placed myself while unwilling to exercise self-scrutiny; and Thou set me face to face with myself, that I might behold how foul I was, and how crooked and sordid, bespotted and ulcerous. And I beheld and loathed myself; and whither to fly from myself I discovered not (Bk. 8.7.16).

Augustine says that, as a young man, he had even prayed, ‘Grant me chastity and continency [that is, self-control], but not yet(Bk. 8.7.17).  He also chose to pursue what he calls ‘worldly hopes’ but later came to see them as ‘the baggage of vanity’ that they were.  But, when confronted directly with his true condition, Augustine was ‘consumed and mightily confounded with a horrible shame.’  He had no arguments left against turning to God, and found himself left in ‘silent trembling’ (Bk. 8.7.18).

Augustine then spends some time telling how he vacillated.  Wanting to turn to God, he nevertheless considered how great a cost it would be to himself to relinquish the desires of his ‘unclean members’ (Bk. 8.11.27).  He knows that he could not become a Christian and, at the same time, continue in his fleshly desires for they were opposed to God’s holy demands.  But his desires controlled him.  How could he possibly give them up?  Did he even want to give them up?  About this, he wrote,

My will was the enemy master of, and thence had made a chain for me and bound me. Because of a perverse will was lust made; and lust indulged in became custom; and custom not resisted became necessity. By which links, as it were, joined together (whence I term it a chain), did a hard bondage hold me enthralled (Bk. 8.5.10).

Augustine came to be sorry for his sins, however.  We might first only fear God’s judgement for sin, but we must come to a point of sorrow over our sins.  Augustine does not even mention any fear of God’s wrath for the sins he committed, though he might well have done so.  Rather, he expressed sorrow over his life of sin itself, a bondage to a filthy life.  We need to come to the point of regretting our own sin, regretting how it offends God, regretting how we hurt others, and regretting what we are doing to ourselves.  Such regret is a loathing of sin for the horrible work it does.  And a loathing of sin turns into a sorrow that results in conversion, a turning to God.  Having come to loath his sin, Augustine experienced sorrow for his sin.  He began to weep, and he calls this an acceptable sacrifice to God (cf. 1 Pt. 2.5).  His tears of repentance were his sin offering to God, and He identifies his strong emotions as contrition—a heartfelt sorrow for his sins (Bk. 8.12.28-29).  Repentance can be a mental exercise—more of an act of the mind, a resolve to live differently, but contrition is a sorrow of the heart.  Conversion progresses from loathing sin to sorrow to repentance.

Just then, Augustine heard from over the wall a child at play repeatedly saying, ‘Take up and read.’  Augustine had heard how the monk, St. Antony, had been converted upon hearing read a passage from Scripture.  So, Augustine went back to where he had left his copy of Paul’s writings on a bench in the garden and opened the book.  He read two verses from the epistle to the Romans:

Let us walk properly as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and sensuality, not in quarreling and jealousy. 14 But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires (Rom. 13.13-14, ESV). 

This was the moment of Augustine’s conversion.  He says, ‘No further would I read, nor did I need; for instantly, as the sentence ended — by a light, as it were, of security infused into my heart — all the gloom of doubt vanished away.’  Augustine had passed from darkness into the light of Christ.  He was converted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...