Skip to main content

Homosexuals and Transgenders: Is the Church to Bless, Prove Repentance, or Reject?

 

The latest innovations of those departing from the faith once for all delivered to the saints is to bless same sex unions.  Not to be outdone by the Church of England, which began this blessing of sin in December, the Vatican has followed.  The different reasoning for this aside, both signal by such an action an approval of a sin forbidden by the Church for two thousand years and by God’s people long before (cf. Leviticus 18.22; 20.13). 

In the Apostolic Constitutions of the Christian Church from the late 4th century, same sex relations (sodomy) and transgenderism (effeminacy) were condemned rather than blessed, along with activities of sorcerers.  The pertinent text reads:

He that is guilty of sins not to be named, a sodomite, an effeminate person, a magician, an enchanter, an astrologer, a diviner, an user of magic verses, a juggler, a mountebank, one that makes amulets, a charmer, a soothsayer, a fortune-teller, an observer of palmistry; he that, when he meets you, observes defects in the eyes or feet of the birds or cats, or noises, or symbolic sounds: let these be proved for some time, for this sort of wickedness is hard to be washed away; and if they leave off those practices, let them be received; but if they will not agree to that, let them be rejected (Apostolic Constitutions VIII.XXXII).[1]

The text groups such sins together because they are examples of besetting sins.  Such sins are often difficult to overcome, though we recognise God’s power to transform the sinner’s desires beyond his or her efforts through spiritual disciplines.  Otherwise, the person is not only to repent and show contrition but to prove himself or herself over time as a person living in righteousness before our holy God.

Instead of showing sinners the path to righteousness, the blessing of persons recognised in their sin and for their sin affirms them in their sin and their continuation in it.  The Apostolic Constitutions is a gracious document, allowing space for sinners to repent and be received back into fellowship, but it is clear that those rejecting correction are to be rejected from communion.  To bless a homosexual in a same sex relationship or a transsexual identifying as a woman is equivalent to blessing a person practicing sorcery and augury. The Church has never considered either—until this present generation.  In so doing, it shows itself not the be the Church at all but a mocking imitation of the body of Christ.


[1] The translation may be found online: https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/07158.htm (accessed 5 February, 2024).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...
Post a Comment
Read more