Skip to main content

The ‘All Things’ of Romans 8.28: Are they about how God turns adversity into something good?

Romans 8.28 in the ESV translation reads,

And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.

After considering the translation, the question that begs for an answer is whether the common interpretation of this verse is correct.  That is, is Paul saying that God turns adversity into something good for those who love Him, or does his point lie elsewhere?

First, the verse could be translated differently, as the NIV does:

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.

The meaning is very close however the passage is translated.  The difference is whether ‘all things’ or ‘God’ is the subject in the verse.  Do all things work together for good, or does God work all things together for good?  The Greek grammar could go either way, so we will not find a solution to this merely by the grammar.  My preference in translation lies with the NIV, however, as it captures the meaning of the verse read in light of the whole chapter better.  The interpretation of the verse, however, does not depend on how we translate the verse.

Moving on, then, we need to ask, ‘What does Paul mean by “all things”?’  The popular interpretation of the verse is intentionally general: whatever happens, things will work out for good.  Things are determined by God, even the bad things, and we just need to trust Him.  Thus, the popular interpretation is that, when something bad happens, God can and does turn this into something good.  On this view, the things mentioned in verse 35 are the focus of "all things": "tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword".  Determinism is not, however, Paul’s point in this verse.  "All things" refers to what God does and accomplishes despite the challenges we face.

The immediate context in vv. 29-30, the entire chapter 8, and the parallel in Ephesians 1 all point in a different direction from the popular interpretation.  Let us pause in our pursuit of the right interpretation to note that one wanting to take the route of the popular interpretation might find some assistance with Romans 5.3-4, where Paul appreciates that suffering produces perseverance, which produces character, which produces hope.  Similarly, James says, ‘Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, 3 for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness’ (1.2-3).  These texts do not lead us to determinism, but they do speak of adversity that God uses to bring some good.

Be that as it may, I would suggest the better understanding of Romans 8.28 lies with the view Paul expresses in Ephesians:

In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will… (1.11).

Note that God is the one working all things.  The 'all things' is what He does to affirm our inheritance, our predestined end, His will.  The passage is also close to Romans 8 in that the notion of predestination is in view: the ‘all things’ that God is working is for those He has predestined, that is, who are in His salvation plan, and He works things out according to His purpose and by His will.  Ephesians 1 brings out nicely the point that God works out His plan so that we ‘might be to the praise of His glory’ (v. 12).  The parallel with Romans also brings out this goal of our being glorified (Romans 8.30).  We see, too, that ‘all things’ in Ephesians 1.11 relate to God’s plan, and this helps us further with Romans.  The ‘all things’ are not things that happen to us but the salvation that God is working according to His plan.

I might suggest as another aside that the focus is not on a personal predestination but on God's plan.  Ephesians 1 is not about personal or individual matters but about God's plan and the Church, His people.  Just as in the Old Testament individual people, despite participation in God's people and covenant, could reject everything and deny God, as many did.  God's plan remains, despite whether individuals fit in or fall out.  What we are considering, then, is not that individuals are either elect or not or whether they can lose their salvation or not (eternal security).  The individual theological discussion is not in view.  Predestination is God's plan; it is the inheritance that God has planned for His people.

Romans 8.29-30 lays this plan out in full:

For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

Thus, the ‘all things’ that God works out for those who love Him are His plans of predestination to be conformed to Christ’s image, His calling, His work of justification, and His glorification of us.

In the Ephesians parallel, we see the same theological thought.  In Ephesians 1.3-14, the following words lay out the dimensions of God’s plan: we are blessed in Christ with every spiritual blessing, chosen in Christ to be holy and blameless, predestined for adoption as God’s sons through Jesus Christ, redeemed through Christ’s blood, forgiven of our trespasses, enlightened as to the mystery of God’s will, made beneficiaries of an inheritance, and sealed with the promised Holy Spirit.  These are the ‘all things’ that God works for us, the body of Christ, the Church.

In Romans 8, ‘all things’ is not only explained in the immediate context of v. 28 by vv. 29-30 but also by the whole chapter.  As with Ephesians, Paul has in mind what God is doing for us according to His plan.  Thus, despite our sin, He has worked out a plan on Christ Jesus so that we will not be condemned (8.1).  He has a plan that frees us from slavery to sin and death (8.2).  Where the Law failed, God succeeded in accomplishing righteousness in us through Jesus Christ (8.3-4).  He has given us His empowering Spirit so that, by walking in accordance with Him, we might obtain life and peace (8.5-11).  By the Spirit, we obtain sonship and inheritance (8.12-17).  Despite suffering, a greater glory awaits us in God’s plan, the redemption of our bodies (8.18-23).  Thus, we have salvation and hope, as well as help in our weakness, for the Spirit intercedes for us according to God’s will (8.24-27).

This litany of things—the ‘all things’—that God works for us is what Paul has in mind in the next verse, v. 28, the verse at the centre of our scrutiny.  We have already noted the terms describing God’s plan in the next two verses.  God’s plan is complete from beginning to end—all things God works for those He loves.  Then Paul asks, ‘What then shall we say to these things?’ (v. 31).  The answer: ‘If God is for us, who can be against us?’  There is no part of God’s plan that escapes His working for our good.  He has it all covered.  He asks, ‘He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?’ (v. 32).  There is that word again—ta panta, all things.  The all things that God graciously gives are all things necessary for our salvation.

Paul covers ground already covered to draw out His point in the conclusion.  If someone brings a charge against us, God justifies (v. 33).  If someone condemns us, Jesus intercedes for us (v. 34).  If something threatens to separate us from God’s love, such as tribulation, distress, persecution, famine, nakedness, danger, or a sword, the One who has loved us makes us to be more than conquerors. Not anything—death or life, angels or rulers, things present or future, powers, height, depth, anything in all creation—can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord (vv. 35-39).

We might also note in these verses the repetition of 'all things' such that the meaning in verse 28 is definitively clarified.  The 'all things' of verse 28 is opposed to the 'all things' of verse 37, the latter having the sense of ‘despite all these things’.  All that God provides (vv. 28-29) is accomplished despite all these other things.  Let us, then, read the whole passage with an eye toward this repetition:

What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? 32 He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? 33 Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. 34 Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? 36 As it is written,

            “For your sake we are being killed all the day long;

               we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.”

37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

So we conclude: Romans 8.28 is not about how God turns adversity into something good for us.  Rather, it is about how God has worked a great salvation in so many dimensions—all things—for us in Christ Jesus and through the Holy Spirit.  It is an impeccable salvation that is not subject to flaws or failure.  Paul does believe that suffering can be and is used by God for some good, but this is not His point in Romans 8.28.  The ‘all things’ God works for our good are the plan He accomplishes for those who love Him and are called into that plan according to His purposes. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

Was Jesus’ Criticism of the Pharisees’ Ethic Its Legalism or Lawlessness?

The popular understanding of the Pharisees is that they were legalists.  This is not, however, Jesus’ criticism of their ethics, even though the charge of Pharisaic legalism comes from a (mis)reading of the Gospels.  The Pharisees are cast in popular imagination as the quintessential example of legalists, overly focussed on rules and promoting works in order to attain righteousness apart from God’s grace.  The latter view, that Judaism overall and the Pharisees in particular advocated works righteousness, has been loudly criticised in light of numerous texts in second temple Judaism, celebrating God’s grace in choosing the Jews, not self-righteous works. [1]   Be that as it may, the Pharisees have remained the foil to Christian ethics precisely over their purported legalism—a focus on unloving, unforgiving rules and regulations that also places norms above, purportedly, higher moral principles.  Jesus’ ethic is contrasted as an ethic of forgiveness, mercy, love...

Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving

[The following post continues notes and studies on the issue of wealth, poverty, and Christian ethics.  It originally appeared in an online publication: Rollin G. Grams, 'Early Christian Views on Wealth, Possessions, and Giving,'   Explorations (Fall, 2010), an online publication of the Robert C. Cooley Center for the Study of Early Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary.  Online:  https://www.scribd.com/document/41882213/The-Cooley-Center-Articles-Early-Christian-Views-on-Wealth ]  For several reasons, study of early Christianity in Protestant circles is on the rise.  Ecumenical dialogue, for instance, requires a return to the common ground of Christian writers prior to the great schisms of the Church throughout history.  Also, an increasing interest in worship and spiritual disciplines has sent some Protestants on pilgrimage to more ancient and liturgical forms of the church.  Recent challenges to long-standing Christian practices...