Skip to main content

The Peace of Christ: An Advent Message

 

The second week of Advent focusses on peace.  I suppose that the first week’s focus on hope hits us first in a more personal way.  I say, ‘I hope’.  But when we speak of peace, we often have grander notions in mind, like peace in the Middle East or in Ukraine.  In today’s lesson, we will start with the idea of peace on earth but end up with a focus on the peace of the Church, in our families, and in our own lives.

Governments

We have heard the phrase, ‘Peace through strength’.  It is perhaps most associated with policies of governments during the Cold War, but ‘peace through strength’ was the heart of imperial Rome, the pax Romana.  The first emperor, Augustus Caesar, boasted that he had brought piracy under control and fought numerous wars to establish peace in the empire.

Yet we have learned to fear governmental power.  An article just yesterday, entitled ‘Slipping through our fingers: How democracy is being eroded’, mentions multiple ways in which the Labour government is taking power away from the people in the UK.[1]  It mentions the elimination of trial by journey for lesser crimes.  It has promoted the use of digital technology to identify citizens such that government is able to monitor and control citizens’ access to work and movements.  It has postponed council and mayoral elections.  Hereditary peers are being removed from the House of Lords, allowing the appointment of compliant peers.  The article suggests the government’s decriminalization of abortion to term and pressing ahead with an assisted suicide bill are examples of its understanding of the role of government to be to manage rather than serve the people.

Now, the mention of these examples may have awakened your own political instincts and concerns.  Yet, despite my own views on such matters, I would note that God’s people have existed under various governments, sometimes being persecuted and even killed, at other times ruling with the rulers.  God’s people served in the powerful courts of ancient Persia, Israel, and Rome.  Even in the Old Testament, a government of judges, from Moses to Samuel, was replaced with a government of kings.  The Old Testament sets its hand on this scale, preferring judges to kings.  This was not because they were more effective but because they were more reliant upon God.  Yet, in Isaiah 11, God’s provision of salvation comes through a king who acts as a judge.  How can God’s solution come through an inferior sort of government?  Why was God's Saviour not one who did away with the monarchy and return to the judges of Israel?

The answer is that this coming king would be a righteous judge ruling in the fear of the LORD.  We should recall that Isaiah 11’s promise of a coming king is a continuation of the promise in earlier chapters.  In Isaiah 9, he is called the ‘Almighty God' and 'Prince of Peace’ (v. 6).  According to chapter 11, the coming king

·       is a hereditary successor to King David, the son of Jesse

·       has the Spirit of the LORD rest upon him

·       receives through the Spirit God’s wisdom, understanding, counsel, might, and knowledge and fear of the LORD

The coming king would be a righteous judge bringing peace on the earth.

Righteous Judgement

This means that he will judge the poor with righteousness and the meek of the earth with equity.  He will not judge by what he sees or hears.  One of the great errors theologically and politically in our time is the confusion of equity with preferential justice.  Theologically, we have heard for decades that ‘God is on the side of the poor’ from Marxists pitting the poor against the rich.  On this view, God’s being on the side of the poor means that He is against the rich, just as Karl Marx attacked the bourgeoisie in favour of the poor.  More recently, the term ‘equity’ has been used not to mean equality but privileging the poor.  Social Marxists have extended this view to mean more than the economically poor but any group disadvantaged or perceived to be disadvantaged.  Consequently, they have advanced people in one group over another in jobs and programmes while disadvantaging those whom they have perceived as belonging to a privileged class.

Note that the king who judges righteously will not judge this way. He will not judge with his eyes or ears but with what is righteous.  Elsewhere in Scripture, we learn that this means judging each person rightly, not according to their class, whether poor or rich.   Exodus 23.2-3 says,

You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice, 3 nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his lawsuit.

Leviticus 19.15 says,

You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.

And in Deuteronomy 1.17 we read,

You shall not be partial in judgment. You shall hear the small and the great alike. You shall not be intimidated by anyone, for the judgment is God’s.

Judging partially can also be associated with corruption in government.  We read in Deuteronomy 16.19,

You shall not pervert justice. You shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and subverts the cause of the righteous.

God, Scripture teaches, is an impartial judge and takes no bribe (Deuteronomy 10.17; Job 34.19; Luke 20.21; Acts 10.34; Romans 2.10; Galatians 2.6; 1 Peter 1.17).  Therefore, His people must not be corrupted by bribery (Deuteronomy 16.19; 2 Chronicles 19.7; Proverbs 24.23; 28.21; Malachi 2.9; Eph. 6.9 and Col. 3.25; 1 Timothy 5.21; James 2.1, 9).

The main problem with a justice system that views one group preferentially is that it opposes giving justice to one group.  The group most often disenfranchised is the weakest group, which the Old Testament does not claim to be victims but simply those without protectors or property or power in society.  Thus, we read in Deuteronomy 27.19,

‘Cursed be anyone who perverts the justice due to the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

These groups are repeatedly mentioned in the Old Testament.  In the New Testament, James says,

Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world (1.27).

There are two sides to this coin.  If you take away justice from one group, you offer unjust privilege to another group.  Psalm 82.2-4 says,

“How long will you judge unjustly

                        and show partiality to the wicked? Selah

3          Give justice to the weak and the fatherless;

                        maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute.

4          Rescue the weak and the needy;

                        deliver them from the hand of the wicked.”

Proverbs 24.23-26 string together three related proverbs on this point:

 These also are sayings of the wise.

             Partiality in judging is not good.

24        Whoever says to the wicked, “You are in the right,”

                        will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations,

25        but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight,

                        and a good blessing will come upon them.

26        Whoever gives an honest answer

                        kisses the lips.

James succinctly states, ‘But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors’ (2.9).  In his case, James is particularly concerned with a church showing partiality to the rich, although the more general law against showing partiality covers any injustice arising from preferential treatment of one group over another.

All this is background to Isaiah’s vision of a king who would judge righteously.  The problem with kingship, God pointed out, was that the king would establish a palace and require of the population a large number of slaves and increase government taxes.  Yet a just king could have the power to judge righteously, and this is what Isaiah hopes for in chapter 11.  Subsequent chapters promise a reversal for Israel under a righteous king and for kingdoms surrounding Israel where injustice was the norm.  One of their great sins was pride over other nations that led them to abuse and subjugate others.

John the Baptist and Jesus

Now, when we come to the ministry of John the Baptist, we see that his ministry was a preparation for the coming of this king.  Once again, the prophet whose words we are following is Isaiah.  From chapter 40, Isaiah envisions the coming of a ‘servant’ of God, and what is said about this servant is what has already been said about the righteous king.  The word ‘servant’ could even be translated as ‘slave’, but the emphasis is on the service that this one will render: he will do what God says in bringing justice on the earth.  The one John pointed to was the one who would do the will of God.

The little that Matthew tells us (3.1-12) about John the Baptist’s preaching is that warned people of their sins, called on them to confess their sins in repentance, be cleansed, and bear fruit in keeping with their repentance.  Baptism in water was a symbol of this.  He told the two, powerful religious organisations, the Pharisees and the Sadducees, to repent before God’s judgement came.  John pointed to one to come after him, to Jesus, whom he said would baptise them with the Holy Spirit and fire (v. 12).  What Jesus ministry would add to John’s ministry was the giving of the Holy Spirit, who would provide a divine cleansing and an empowering to live according to God’s Law.  The baptism of fire refers to God’s coming judgement.  People would have to choose between Spirit-gifting to be God's righteous people on the earth or God's judgement.  The coming of God's reign, the Kingdom of God, meant both.

What does this all have to do with the theme of peace at Christmas?  The angels announcing Jesus’ birth in Luke’s Gospel say, ‘Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!’ (2.14).  Yet, we do not get peace on earth.  In fact, Jesus says at one point to His disciples, ‘Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword’ (Matthew 10.34).  How do we put all this together?

The answer is that Jesus’ ministry of God’s kingdom on earth comes in two stages.  His future, second coming will fulfill the expectations that we have been speaking about: a coming king who will bring righteous judgement on the earth.  The first coming of Jesus was to establish the conditions for righteousness on the earth, that is, to bring forgiveness of sins.  Matthew reminds us that Jesus’ name means ‘salvation’, for He would save His people from their sins (1.21).  Matthew adds that Jesus was also the Immanuel of Isaiah 7.14, meaning ‘God with us’.  Jesus was the presence of God on earth bringing salvation to a sinful people.  Just how God would do this came as a great surprise to all of His disciples, in fact, to everyone.  Instead of reigning from a throne and establishing justice on the earth, He was raised up on a cross as a blood sacrifice to save His people from their sins.

Micah's Prophecy

Micah was another 8th c. BC prophet in Israel, a contemporary of Isaiah.  Both prophets prophesied that God would allow Israel to go into captivity for sins but that He would also restore His people.  Both prophets speak of the coming ruler of Israel who would bring this restoration.  Both say that he would come from the line of King David, and Micah says this by identifying his birthplace in Bethlehem of Judea (5.2).  He says that he will ‘stand and shepherd his flock in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of the name of the LORD his God’ (5.4).  What this means for this flock, for His people, is that ‘they shall dwell secure’ (5.4) and ‘he shall be their peace’ (5.5).  This prophecy is not only for a future time, when Jesus comes again, for Paul says that Jesus is our peace (2.14).

A Peaceable People

How, then, can we claim peace when there is destruction all around us?  We need to understand that God’s kingdom has not fully come, that His will is not fully done on earth as in heaven.  This is why we pray for the coming of His kingdom and His will even now.  The answer to this question is that Jesus has established for Himself a peaceable kingdom in us, His Church—a people who witness to the coming peace that He will one day bring.  This peace is nowhere found in the institutions of man, neither in governments nor in institutional churches.  It is a peace in a people washed clean in baptism and filled with the Holy Spirit.

Thus, when we celebrate the advent of Jesus’ peace on the earth, we are reminded of the challenge this places upon us.  We are God’s peaceable people in a world of hostility and sin.  We can only be this witness if we point people to Jesus, who, by His sacrifice for our sins has won a people for Himself.  What God’s peace looks like in us is described by Paul in his letter to Titus:

For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, 12 training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, 13 waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works (2.11-14).

We are, then, to be a peaceable people but also a witness and warning to the world of God’s peace through our Saviour, Jesus Christ.  We will not find God’s peace in governments of this world but look to the coming of Jesus.  For the present, we are challenged to live peacefully with all. 

Peace in our Own Lives

This message is not only about governments and powerful institutions, it is about every aspect of our lives.  Paul’s letter to the Ephesians is a letter about the peace and unity that Jesus is establishing even now as He rules from the right hand of God.  It is a peace with God, who has saved us from our sins.  It is a peace between Jews and Gentiles in God’s people.  It is a unity in God’s people, separated from sin and growing up into Christ, our head.  It is a peace in the home between wives and husbands, parents and children, masters and slaves.  In fact, Paul goes so far as to defend divorce from an unbelieving spouse on the basis of being called to peace: ‘But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace’ (1 Corinthians 2.15).  Note in these words, ‘God has called you to peace’.  As Paul says, ‘And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body’ (Colossians 2.15).

Thus, this Advent week, we are reminded that Christ Jesus is the promised heir to the throne of David who would bring the peace of God to this world.  He did so by establishing the basis for peace, removing our sins through His sacrificial, substitutionary death on the cross.  He thereby bought for Himself a people to become His peaceable kingdom on the earth until His future coming, when He will establish peace once and for all in this world.  Presently, as His people, we have access to and are under His rule.  We are invited to let the peace of Christ rule among us, in the Church, in our families, and in our own hearts.



[1] Laura Dodsworth, ‘Slipping through our fingers: How democracy is being eroded,’ The Free Mind (5 Dec., 2025); Slipping Through Our Fingers: How democracy is being eroded (accessed 6 December, 2025).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘For freedom Christ has set us free’: The Gospel of Paul versus the Custodial Oversight of the Law and Human Philosophies

  Introduction The culmination of Paul’s argument in Galatians, and particularly from 3.1-4.31, is: ‘ For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’ (Galatians 5.1). This essay seeks to understand Paul’s opposition to a continuing custodial role for the Law and a use of human philosophies to deal with sinful passions and desires.   His arguments against these are found in Galatians and Colossians.   By focussing on the problem of the Law and of philosophy, we can better understand Paul’s theology.   He believed that the Gospel was the only way to deal with sin not simply in terms of our actions but more basically in terms of our sinful desires and passions of the flesh. The task ahead is to understand several large-scale matters in Paul’s theology, those having to do with a right understanding of the human plight and a right understanding of God’s solution.   So much Protestant theology has articulated...

Alasdair MacIntyre and Tradition Enquiry

Alasdair MacIntyre's subject is philosophical ethics, and he is best known for his critique of ethics understood as the application of general, universal principles.  He has reintroduced the importance of virtue ethics, along with the role of narrative and community in defining the virtues.  His focus on these things—narrative, community, virtue—combine to form an approach to enquiry which he calls ‘tradition enquiry.’ [1] MacIntyre characterises ethical thinking in the West in our day as ethics that has lost an understanding of the virtues, even if virtues like ‘justice’ are often under discussion.  Greek philosophical ethics, and ethics through to the Enlightenment, focussed ethics on virtue and began with questions of character: 'Who should we be?', rather than questions of action, 'What shall we do?'  Contemporary ethics has focused on the latter question alone, with the magisterial traditions of deontological ('What rules govern our actions?') and tel...

The New Virtues of a Failing Culture

  An insanity has fallen upon the West, like a witch’s spell.   We have lived with it long enough to know it, understand it, but not long enough to resist it, to undo it.   The very stewards of the truth that would remove it have left their posts.   They have succumbed to its whispers, become its servants.   It has infected the very air and crept along the ground like a mist until it is within us and all about us.   We utter its precepts like schoolchildren taught their lines. Its power lies in its claims of virtuosity, distorted goodness.   If presented as the vices that they are, they would be rejected.   These virtues are proclaimed from the pulpits and painted on banners or made into flags.   They are established in our schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries.   They are the hallucinogen making our own cultural suicide bearable, even desirable.   They are virtues, but disordered, or they are the excess or deficiency of...