Today--9 February, 2023--marks the day in history that the Church of England has declared unequivocally by vote in the General Synod, 'We are willing heretics and rejoice.' The general synod had before it a motion to bless same-sex unions and marriages in the liturgy of the Church, and it voted as follows:
Bishops: 36 for, 4 against, 2
abstentions
Clergy: 111 for, 85 against, 3
abstentions
Laity: 103 for, 92 against, 5
abstentions
This means that the majority of bishops,
clergy, and laity are agreed on this heretical teaching, calling good what
God has called an abomination. Only 9.5% of the bishops, 43% of the
clergy, and 46% of the laity are orthodox on this fundamental teaching.
The percentages of those voting in favour of blessing sin are miniscule,
however, when contrasted to the many bishops, clergy, and laity in the Church
over the past 2,000 years of Church history.
Behind this vote on this issue is
the rejection of other key teachings of the orthodox Church: that Scripture is
the Word of God and the authority in all matters of faith and practice; that
the faith delivered once for all to the Church is the faith of the Church, not
something to evolve and be refashioned for culture outside the faith; that sin
is the human problem, not something to be accepted and welcomed; that the
Church is to be holy and without blemish as the bride of Christ; and that the
Gospel is not only forgiving grace but also transforming grace as a work of
Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit in our lives. This vote today is a vote
against the doctrines of the Church of God, and we must conclude that the
Church of England as a denomination does not carry the same convictions and
does not practice what we in God's Church affirm and do.
On a similar matter of sexual
immorality in the church (both sins, sex with one's father's wife and
homosexuality, are mentioned in Leviticus 18), Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 5:
'Ought you not
rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you' (v. 2);
'I have already
pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing' (v. 3);
'you are to
deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit
may be saved in the day of the Lord' (v. 5);
'I wrote to you
in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— 10 not at all
meaning the sexually immoral of this world' (v. 9);
'now I am
writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he
is guilty of sexual immorality' (v. 11);
'God judges
those outside. “Purge the evil person from among you"' (v. 13).
The Church of England has moved
itself into the category of 'bearing the name of brother' (claiming to be
Christian) and being 'guilty of sexual immorality' (v. 11) and of affirming
those who do such things (Romans 1.32). Paul says,
Though they know
God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die [the
penalty in Leviticus 18, 20], they not only do them but give approval to those
who practice them (Romans 1.32).
The righteous response of
believers to this heretical, majority group is, as Paul says, 'not to
associate' (v. 11) with them. Anglicans have in the past used language
such as being in an 'impaired relationship' with those promoting certain
errors. This language, however, is inadequate and inappropriate in
reference to cults or other religions, where disagreement on fundamental
matters distinguishes one group from the other at the level of being entirely
different religions. Elijah would not have described his disagreements
with Baal worshippers on Mt. Carmel as simply 'impaired relationship.'
This is where things now are with the Church of England and other groups once
in the Anglican Communion that have chosen the path of blessing sin.
The issue of sexual immorality is
one that defines whether one is in the Church or in the realm of Satan (v.
5). Those embracing it are excluded from the Kingdom of God (1
Corinthians 6.9-11). We are not in an impaired relationship with the
Church of England; we are not the same religion. Our effort must not be
framed in terms of restoring the relationship with sinners or 'living in love
and faith' with heretics. Over the past many years, our effort has been
to go after the lost sheep to show them their sin (Matthew 18.15-20).
This process of appeal to sinners ends with 'And if he refuses to listen even
to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector' (Matthew
18.17), that is, as someone outside the people of God.
This is where we now are.
The Church of England as a body has determined to walk in the counsel of the
wicked, stand in the way of sinners, and sit in the seat of scoffers (Psalm
1.1). Blessed is the one who separates himself or herself from them, who
delights in the law of the LORD. May the way of the wicked perish (1.6),
and may those seeking first the Kingdom and God's righteousness who have lived
among these heretics for so long find their way to healthier and righteous
community in the Church of God.
4 comments:
It seems that the laity are better Christians than their teachers by far!
It is evident that the laity are much better at being Christian than the clergy and especially the Bishops. It is devastating and beyond belief.
The problem is, the C of E is the only church for miles around. If in my village the Christians left the parish church then there would be nowhere in the community to gather….
A church 8 miles away does not touch this community.
What happens ‘up there’ at bishop level I disassociate from, down here on the ground I am a Bible believing member of the parish church and teach Jesus and the true gospel.
Christians will be and have been looking for alternative networks. We need to be aware how a connection to the Church of England as a denomination undermines our testimony and fruitfulness as Christians. If it does not make much difference in a particular diocese, that means that the network of the denomination is weak in that spot (it will be otherwise somewhere else). A bad or innocuous network affects us, though. If God calls a young man into ministry, what path does such a network offer? If a village church has 3 or 4 young people in it, how does a weak or bad network affect them in the support that they need from peers and even their prospects for marrying in the faith as they grow up? A weak network also undermines the Church's primary task of missions to the world. Weak networks are inadequate bulwarks against the continuous onslaught of false doctrine in the Church of England and the darkness of a post-Christian world. My suggestion is that Evangelicals focus on breaking ties with the bad network of the Church of England, find unity among themselves, and work on developing the networking needed (beginning with Eph. 4's vision of Church health). Perhaps the beginning step for such unity in the truth would be to call a national gathering of Evangelicals in the Church of England to a prayer conference.
Post a Comment